IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Trans] overview of remaining(?) DISCUSS items for draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-33

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Tue, 24 September 2019 17:38 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676CD1208D4 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:38:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id siVVsxik3g5i for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E43C1208D3 for <trans@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46d7h10kQ5zDmL; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 19:38:09 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1569346689; bh=hEN8YRXqf9wPOOx4hBwU/UIcZyHi+I0W6tBT5H0oueU=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=OOIU0+GJoO4t94lHcWeYsKmq6PBDSykRCtGJRPyUuG1/RySqqxcS/RBkoVOGH4pr2 4HP8urnkZxpIxicVSSdY8EvhclxAVWMKXNvLQgIBZ0yNa+gWHC7anBS0TIGFaha/p/ 015G2wJ0tNVXgulJV8uEX5589x5fpTigbNpJYeYY=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K-j_Kiy8Q0PZ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 19:38:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 19:38:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3C4EE7010D; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 13:38:05 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca 3C4EE7010D
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339DC40D37E1; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 13:38:05 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 13:38:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Andrew Ayer <agwa@andrewayer.name>
cc: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Rob Stradling <rob@sectigo.com>, Trans <trans@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190924075519.6a9daab1def6475bd26e5370@andrewayer.name>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1909241335180.9491@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1909181506160.11898@bofh.nohats.ca> <b6ec6a38-a4c2-64b4-0584-d13deead2605@sectigo.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1909191211080.29314@bofh.nohats.ca> <4632c221-c207-72c4-83c3-ecc8dcbf2ba7@sectigo.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1909231733480.23118@bofh.nohats.ca> <20190924075519.6a9daab1def6475bd26e5370@andrewayer.name>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/Mxd_Ef0B9kTLs512ftmJoG6NeOU>
Subject: Re: [Trans] overview of remaining(?) DISCUSS items for draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-33
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:38:15 -0000

On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, Andrew Ayer wrote:

>> While I agree with you, I am just a WG chair. So we need to hear a few
>> more opinions of people and then if there is a consensus, we can go
>> ahead and make this change.
>
> I'm also not sure what "this change" would be, but I agree with the
> other comments here that CT shouldn't provide a mechanism for logs to
> change URL.

I meant the clarification text of Base URL change (verus a potential
other consensus of text that would allow updating the base url)

I'm not sure what the policy is for declaring a registry append only.
Maybe leave a comment in for IANA whether or not that needs text? Or
alternatively, in the text for the Expert Review, mention the
registry is strictly append-only ?

Paul

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email