Re: [Trans] Mozilla's basic take on Binary Transparency
Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> Wed, 29 March 2017 11:48 UTC
Return-Path: <benl@google.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D8A1296B2 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 04:48:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SKr7mcGq3ZZO for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 04:48:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22d.google.com (mail-vk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACCD51296A6 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 04:48:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id z204so14173928vkd.1 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 04:48:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=X1MgGNEYy1TWCPdHaEB27EFAFA+VsxOUhn5bAkTmeBg=; b=TcObeE90OMMNDoGqYvibHQCba47JEp/hDA4qX60t3T6v4v4LlKQV7zG6EXRimdGbaD Zl8AQOVrAsfwgp3+RBOscDyMC3bYmqXVqEJBe88PFxKwskp/GKmN+s3YVvbe+c3m119P KKbEJRsV8taE7+7kJVEzhz9jvirOnhRMuiGvPR1jfTPs6O+HHp39eeB34PYS3i9qjLBM LkNRRbdTIKbRQKFqusPTIC1ziSeSlF505KLjzv+mok4ovm/Ach29Jqrqx8Ad0icXu7HS ooT3G014uFK9btdY9lJzvPcJEfYQpsYZpJJpZixcE+ObhNG4cBTnl7mS9DJrhbvZCkDK Rd1A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=X1MgGNEYy1TWCPdHaEB27EFAFA+VsxOUhn5bAkTmeBg=; b=Dt8z+dXy02JOFEZ2t0XXrxGF5rhzgvgLQJ25nG0XGQoGDGo5TmpJ4lJyiYko4AFHxl fjDiyjBxwPp1bvFpH28wbTFGomi1mAf9dz16mY0KUJfDb3tzV2z+xfDOqZQjsZ2FowLG t35HiecPqmCTb3OTAULa13dIt7ILuvOHLbrBErZtDGJgeOnDnwK8d4KK3pEhyBJRMAyg C3YBaal7LlPUyKqR2Vj1/vt/DJaG/2bv5sUMkwzefjpvUYWVUo85/OTBg/401IpDWnsW aM7kLi7WIoiYc5nhW1K4O6i8ZLXoS9MAsdGeYTenM013GuiS1QRdNoo8/8PPydPxGfMD AZbg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0PB+czbb2sRJxWn62W7I2+dnZ6HKCNbAvpaQjD5wtlR2Aqs3opYVr/1pwQTdLcBy0ZsJkA839EsGF3GmH4
X-Received: by 10.159.40.7 with SMTP id c7mr13490uac.91.1490788130461; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 04:48:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.174.73 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 04:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgQ5MR6o2wWu=NUpneJ8UPmqxkFmBY4Y-+vCUtxvVCBu5g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL02cgQ5MR6o2wWu=NUpneJ8UPmqxkFmBY4Y-+vCUtxvVCBu5g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:48:49 +0100
Message-ID: <CABrd9SSbBV3zjR-+fY6P8P0mpKbceGoGOSKss6n13v-3NS=+Gg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Cc: Trans <trans@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1ab7aaf424a3054bdd28be"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/OIfHWNTHxtLFRbQd6pdff3cFfcc>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Mozilla's basic take on Binary Transparency
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:48:54 -0000
On 28 March 2017 at 20:21, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> wrote: > As I said at the mic, there's some work going on at Mozilla to implement a > form of Binary Transparency, leveraged on top of CT. Here's the outline: > > https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Binary_Transparency > Cool! Are you planning to build this from scratch, or use Trillian ( https://github.com/google/trillian)? > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Trans mailing list > Trans@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans > >
- [Trans] Mozilla's basic take on Binary Transparen… Richard Barnes
- Re: [Trans] Mozilla's basic take on Binary Transp… Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] Mozilla's basic take on Binary Transp… Richard Barnes
- Re: [Trans] Mozilla's basic take on Binary Transp… Ben Laurie