IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Trans] Volunteer opportunity! (was Re: DNSSEC also needs CT)

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Tue, 13 May 2014 05:26 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089C61A0842 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 May 2014 22:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id INUNzWuR0jSm for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 May 2014 22:26:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-x22a.google.com (mail-pb0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9A31A083F for <trans@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 May 2014 22:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id rp16so565100pbb.1 for <trans@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 May 2014 22:26:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=P9eQlMmnGasB1zwP3q9rbRG+NtjamKjdsvFQbij7G1w=; b=uYNenK2NNpRd9P1ji9u9DWZGWDuLZ7sW56YEWWsaU2UDZnONYPNp27Y867/LIrA6dz GmHiVjcjtGzduN7k6/M9psFUwlbTSHu/ullKxgX7B27XXN+mRwVKD8Z2x5kDH3cv/Aej nyV8Y+ZY7pL7oSLzO8YePmp3hpwvicPDYSG/QxJb+0rWzxQZNBLYmVoceyJRiL24d1BF CBVsKsG6HAvkekPtAw6TDNYlXno11WPScmAMbAVswYgp9l+sqfmDfDDn1mXLQ45knvhA VtktpCKmDc2ItHFT/kXehRketMjEAfpBkBdRZ3WMtXXtznZx6+edHdopx6EeoS8aVyMK Xhog==
X-Received: by 10.66.248.228 with SMTP id yp4mr62237957pac.94.1399958781941; Mon, 12 May 2014 22:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spandex.local (216-67-116-181-rb3.fai.dsl.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [216.67.116.181]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jq6sm6422829pbb.76.2014.05.12.22.26.20 for <trans@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 12 May 2014 22:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5371ACFB.5020604@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 21:26:19 -0800
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: trans@ietf.org
References: <CAK3OfOjiL2DTJPH3CaAjg8YGrrwN56SgQ+DnqPXx4MLbgXQN+A@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwieij8Tm8V-gpE0eAfwie1dgtFL_Ga8dPkJFKJKLQDAcA@mail.gmail.com> <CAK3OfOiKjY6YyiyeHiFJrecZfj_uQ-2k+KucKnzb9Yt8VCRPOQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iKpN7AXfrH6SzroMukrKTPR5z24U9KfWpVW-F2R_wX3ag@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1405101722240.897@bofh.nohats.ca> <CABrd9ST7K-7RGwGD2G+kDcVSceC2ZJ-5Tz2tdp5NWa3cqBK+-w@mail.gmail.com> <CAOe4Ui=nqmCfjBYNE2CJtEs1jnbavpY4Dv-T3FRDdAwAA2dScg@mail.gmail.com> <CAK3OfOiYMJkXVR+QsCzEV0ir6u53coJz0b-JdGGD5bTTz5YcMg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOe4Ui=u0fkm9_nuXx_6gpH6jHM5pBvzjzru9O8y3bpLkA0qmw@mail.gmail.com> <CAK3OfOi6y=QAMXe_2axiavxwR5nS2Uv8SM4JxQHsvEKbUyNGCA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOe4Uimvc6e6u=fJjM1-iaOTepA33Sx5CBjMV9dB8sSLqtZoWA@mail.gmail.com> <CAK3OfOhdhWdGvvhuaGyE_p5kLy0ZX-V5sAXfoLGP_8d8vPJDgg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK3OfOhdhWdGvvhuaGyE_p5kLy0ZX-V5sAXfoLGP_8d8vPJDgg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/Pw5zcQrNVYGNcQutmLvSldSVQJw
Subject: [Trans] Volunteer opportunity! (was Re: DNSSEC also needs CT)
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 05:26:29 -0000

On 5/12/14 9:12 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
> Incidentally, rfc6962bis could use an operational considerations
> section covering issues such as what CAs are expected to be logged.

We've talked about the possibility of breaking out client behavior
into a separate document, and while that discussion focused on
the protocol between a client and a log server it seems that
this sort of thing may belong there, as well.

Nobody has stepped forward to draft a document but at this point
it would be very helpful indeed if someone could step forward and
contribute some text.

Melinda

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email