Re: [Trans] Processing feedback from IESG review on draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 29 July 2021 20:58 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C23C3A0BD5 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 13:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.548
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.548 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.452, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5upbgmSt1XG4 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 13:58:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBADD3A0BCF for <trans@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 13:58:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122332.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 16TKno5X023510; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 21:58:23 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=SNP1fjjPO56WOA3y5elSmq9/Ll8oI3EXLqjiMzsyWHs=; b=AbdlcLDpeS2751SwebDmEPM1D5JoXv/npGv43zEUMXMPhK/08kU4dkwC1ORyNA+pISJ5 L6zEwHgSO11ZefZU44N4StsslOBB23+7GAM/hIx+gh+m4Bzj9R9e0pQoP0HciQZfrsdp xsjccSPZJO9YEqlphEBYuh0hKQpL4SA7sdVbxyxtnYv4uKf6Ppaih+XkIsG9U/L2Y+vM Rccj9Ypm4XkwQsyi8i0ky6i7q5mqQPfAijyGJ7p+pPfk8+zvds/sTzWDesLc24oL4uL+ oXTtKYuwUUE/YNftPn5V4N3bW2h+YKCJUnpE7M+z2d6nNAQDsAVXy3nuxXdH2v3yi8qA 8w==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint3 (a72-247-45-31.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.31] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3a36sc6r2h-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 29 Jul 2021 21:58:22 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 16TKnftv005284; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 16:58:22 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.117]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3a36phgm9x-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 29 Jul 2021 16:58:22 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.119) by ustx2ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.123) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 15:58:21 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.023; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 15:58:21 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, Trans <trans@ietf.org>
CC: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Trans] Processing feedback from IESG review on draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis
Thread-Index: AQHXhLx2xcR7//COmUe73LEck6jOrg==
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:58:20 +0000
Message-ID: <42EADCB2-C5ED-4D4A-A8CA-C8628A58D156@akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.51.21071101
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <B97552691403AE4CB5A1FF0D08581857@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-07-29_16:2021-07-29, 2021-07-29 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2107140000 definitions=main-2107290128
X-Proofpoint-GUID: RHaRlWWzcqD7KrjXAylP1vPTtlRNEXtT
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: RHaRlWWzcqD7KrjXAylP1vPTtlRNEXtT
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-07-29_16:2021-07-29, 2021-07-29 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2107140000 definitions=main-2107290128
X-Agari-Authentication-Results: mx.akamai.com; spf=${SPFResult} (sender IP is 72.247.45.31) smtp.mailfrom=rsalz@akamai.com smtp.helo=prod-mail-ppoint3
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/QUsY5EU1UdpYTV5kDGnSU0QrdOU>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Processing feedback from IESG review on draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:58:31 -0000

    ==[ Erik's comments
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis/ballot/*erik-kline

    [Roman] The first two seem like trivial editorial fixes.

Sorry I lost the original mail so responding here and explicitly CC'ing Erik.

> [S1.3] [nit]

>  * Consider expanding SCT and STH on first use.

We fixed this in draft 40, thanks. It was more of a nit-picking nuisance than expected :)

> [S4.2.1] [nit]

> * The first sentence reads like a bit of a run-on sentence to me. Perhaps:

Fixed, thanks!

> [S10.1.2] [comment]

> * Not to start a bikeshed, but "trans" strikes me a bit generic for direct
  registration under ietf:params (I'd think it meant "transport" before I
  thought of "transparency", for example :-).

Yeah, we're not going to re-open that :)