IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Trans] WGLC started for draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Wed, 09 May 2018 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A7B9127444 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2018 07:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NSjU-roS_ciU for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2018 07:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19D08124D68 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2018 07:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40gzzP1z8VzCWH; Wed, 9 May 2018 16:59:45 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1525877985; bh=6gGIgbwpz5bGA7jkfgcu4glwuJ3P9pT+7PSU22dj3sc=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=XofZX9IihpLcbN8nRA91t39q+mvXw8nLmEfWUq8AWD8ic5wurhL68MvLhrt7kZBG3 HF+Di3Bwny4d2HcuvqP3WmBoKpK7jr7vNKIt9IaFKzSL124jXssmxEVtlXzbrigvJy zU/lE59284AI40kzoTq4TeAl15mV6iRNOtuZnFX8=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w0WdBinLd1Ey; Wed, 9 May 2018 16:59:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (vpn.nohats.ca [193.110.157.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 9 May 2018 16:59:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 04E9F4AB8F8; Wed, 9 May 2018 10:59:42 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca 04E9F4AB8F8
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id F37754000C7F; Wed, 9 May 2018 10:59:42 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 10:59:42 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Stephen Kent <s@zerho.info>
cc: Trans <trans@ietf.org>, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <IUUXIbDImicbov7jLKxe4l9QVrF_cCO0F1_mY4LpATYvr-Eag7fAJwnwqnviKXU3drx1vKgpuE6hkehmUMBq2QzPSKNKaMdM3D6LIMv2Gig=@zerho.info>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1805091056280.29472@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1804161658150.17034@bofh.nohats.ca> <cf3fd01c-a1f2-0cd0-d1a2-cda7b9558986@nist.gov> <IUUXIbDImicbov7jLKxe4l9QVrF_cCO0F1_mY4LpATYvr-Eag7fAJwnwqnviKXU3drx1vKgpuE6hkehmUMBq2QzPSKNKaMdM3D6LIMv2Gig=@zerho.info>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/VRJtqH1CZCr8BgagT6X-V9LV65Y>
Subject: Re: [Trans] WGLC started for draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 14:59:51 -0000

On Wed, 9 May 2018, Stephen Kent wrote:

> I believe the current last call was intended to solicit comments only on the changes made since the -012 version, since prior last calls solicited comments on the
> rest of this I-D months ago.

No. Any WGLC is about the entire document, and everyone is free and
encouraged to comment about the entire document. The IETF has no process
of last calling a part of a draft.

I encourage everyone to read the entire document and comment.  Especially,
since the document has been dormant for so long.

Paul

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status