IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Trans] Draft agenda

Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> Mon, 24 February 2014 18:21 UTC

Return-Path: <benl@google.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC3E1A0226 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:21:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.027
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.027 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f7nTxqPTgF9r for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:21:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ve0-x22c.google.com (mail-ve0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD941A0186 for <trans@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:21:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ve0-f172.google.com with SMTP id jz11so4364707veb.3 for <trans@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:21:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=obP4FqtTAGZDDxC2nEK4lCSlabM8TPKAcXwHr4yJ8XI=; b=i8ezF0pVCQoDRWQxEXSpT6WZuCX4fErr4jIXGJY8TpQI5II3aiNwlbg2fkJaDYy2w3 vfWjgZEtoTm2nTjMU8quDGvDVAz/5bCDEEypyjLkfCmuGN1yhB3u4DJE2TBJ6m73y6wa i20vJ4XlqQxIViWx9Z2mD/2X2lPpMMtt6nkGyJ15VRvhydfC0TjK7Ph+sLYl/nE5IPgC ucAB+Z+s4npz30C8jloyh2gsBd2iSI0QiSVe9afoQZ3GdNvplRQ2VGo5Fd3718N9nF/j lZ6ljDMqUvvCe3ZPnqixBnngQ+lkNTz/QAybhyo17WSjaQeTUAe7KoaOUHF/3LATc2FO QDFg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=obP4FqtTAGZDDxC2nEK4lCSlabM8TPKAcXwHr4yJ8XI=; b=PKiP4xegiMBD38Bno4iKrz3QCPjnB+FtbueA4DErORykaR77QqKhD691fjpQZYA6Yr /nCx2BuZHzOAvMODJEnlP+iyEa+CNv2VcuT3aV828WqRl1wFss5RX0MwBUmdWyC4TuqT P84CpDPbw8MA1V/hwa3MHe8n10TMSePb4HOo5VgHmH4xka2BRJnvaO85uPNvkPvpKleg 4UttlEOyx2yBjIr6gmbMovhPXWeBUHr/pGQ60ZzdKQUwiEVGJUWUSJ04iV3AaIrU/14M dAPvZQ45jWl2jv9d47iTb9wwSo9r4S/9OsR9nutdZyoM76Qm2yL8ckGLnHWkunSwmnCt C9bQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQntpr7OtccTR0wbHWqugU6BJUc5+XIIz9rNsliG6cIgBQ3K/6fCsK60j3hpp2UFdVU+nKudW76AlS3P/KPgZzhBf+iUZHgG0GF3lRhNBytMsd3xA6vgaK6MTszeDoL5NqtSpWqIEhm2sz/DWMkDGr8Thw/2tz5rrUpU/wjDEtx56gKdt0WUscehBr/T5TCdtcLt33ZN
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.53.10.137 with SMTP id ea9mr734795vdd.74.1393266085429; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:21:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.230.105 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:21:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <530B86F6.5040201@gmail.com>
References: <53063600.4020102@gmail.com> <CALzYgEe0XrQdKDZN3_dwFLnM87+TXyYRMzj4ZGe5xKi-T_5V+g@mail.gmail.com> <530B86F6.5040201@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:21:25 +0000
Message-ID: <CABrd9SSpyw4nJ9t7X0WDeN+1MnhD+__-QXLOQXYs=h2JCUrwDg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/YTgrXJJSwtbhn-s4BG-clEoHZBY
Cc: Eran Messeri <eranm@google.com>, "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Draft agenda
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:21:37 -0000

On 24 February 2014 17:52, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/24/14 7:35 AM, Eran Messeri wrote:
>> I'll be happy to scribe half the session.
>
> Excellent - thank you.
>
>> As for the agenda, I'd like to suggest discussing handling of private
>> subdomains
>> <https://code.google.com/p/certificate-transparency/issues/detail?id=20>.
>> IMHO while the suggestion in the issue makes sense , it'd benefit from
>> another review to make sure it would work as intended and covers all
>> cases CAs are concerned about.
>
> That one looks to me like a hairball.  Right now it's a MUST
> in 5280 that a serial number be unique for each certificate
> issued by a CA.

Precertificates already share serial numbers with certificates. The
intent of 5280 is not violated by this practice, but perhaps needs
amending to permit it.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email