IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Trans] Future work

Tom Ritter <tom@ritter.vg> Wed, 16 August 2017 21:25 UTC

Return-Path: <tom@ritter.vg>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE3D13271D for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ritter.vg
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uHsyOsPBVvza for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com (mail-qk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C820132356 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id z18so27407543qka.4 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ritter.vg; s=vg; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9af/S9fLdFDnac5yxmbGCWKp27OPABWe2+FqHJhUU1w=; b=JwF7XPxnX8eduDwzPhynhuz6YxUbnAy90T9xhrpuHHbf86QWQtAud7dKFVj/3eLLtj oyF6nHAPWE903pYvSIOBQaY2hDdMbjhIrKyoWUR4XTZFc/o3sNrge0B4p20V8eyNLzE+ a4AyiFYzbc0q22w0QmU0UuS0IAPv+XQlQNAmg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9af/S9fLdFDnac5yxmbGCWKp27OPABWe2+FqHJhUU1w=; b=FgjZOzWjMxcyoBwKHqFF84EiK74KeEZqA6vE1QGkmzur1U2k1x6MSZyjPsjmbPER62 SFtLAe+8ik5FW4zF+W/SYGougA/RZ50jWr4NE1B172bs+ToQbzFxoIYezflUXzPsw8On zh2oVYjaILzBvm5MQOewZp2CPzCuITSRxzJJR+PTRfryoJCkKri6l9cCDu/dUygZNJ2o C+cjk8sxCkJf1xXMqinrGAB3puQ2NHoHFPzZsMpovwRA0mqH5Q5fJ8HJOCTh9irYx1NE C1RXI1v2TlcAzFIVQRpVqI1S3fnqMXXiqBHP5rVg6PrL+iVxwEmvu8Le7ELWyRs+AD1v bjaw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5iwkZalHceZ/7Rktb/yixqNzwdOQ/HcdqK7n4e5aoyFEsXb6hIU tV4nQGUOJlkExFHzJkx2r8eegO50cQUo
X-Received: by 10.55.27.222 with SMTP id m91mr4308331qkh.298.1502918742470; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:25:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.30.67 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:25:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20170816130921.01d50cfec40efb33ab4f0618@andrewayer.name>
References: <2a482e03-7ac9-d5e3-9d69-7694daf1265b@gmail.com> <20170816130921.01d50cfec40efb33ab4f0618@andrewayer.name>
From: Tom Ritter <tom@ritter.vg>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 16:25:21 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+cU71nMGU9ibu0J_CoNFtOcihhLzts0gNp8RBY6V0Ck64Ymww@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrew Ayer <agwa@andrewayer.name>
Cc: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>, "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/aBVFuszJfGMc18N7GQYWQOQD9mw>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Future work
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 21:25:45 -0000

On 16 August 2017 at 15:09, Andrew Ayer <agwa@andrewayer.name> wrote:
> That said, I know of no implementations of SCT feedback, nor of any plans
> by TLS clients to implement any part of gossip.

Well, there's Google's thing, which I talked about here:
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/current/msg02626.html

There was Richard Barnes interest in changing the ways logs operate
(maybe that's what Andrew means by Strict CT?).

I am interested in several of these things, but I do not think I am a
good candidate to be an author.

-tom

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email