IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Trans] Draft agenda

Eran Messeri <eranm@google.com> Mon, 24 February 2014 16:36 UTC

Return-Path: <eranm@google.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C2B1A00FD for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 08:36:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.775
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.775 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M_2gFuUlskcV for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 08:36:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x235.google.com (mail-ob0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 633941A0202 for <trans@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 08:35:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id wp4so5471674obc.40 for <trans@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 08:35:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=wuKcA8jCZXYEFzVqyGru+Ji9llwT33M1Hri8OqwhmGg=; b=M2YEZrXv9k1Bb5UdtYXFP7wFZMlU8nz9nDk47m2e8g7JcxO8SGFoxyxVrFP7b/Itvs DyHWy6Dr78D2LciueFDA2fmrifo/CAUfxowPvTqUQjGr5nh+dfPcF2B2yitoZquWG3Kq P0hAgxNcX8b1a8tSjrnEbLkJGw0Q2/ltX+3fkmQWAUdC/mrKZ7mmAa5xxvJm/6YafaFs NrWIAiHj7/p+1btROeeYyQ8w4vGhDf3innyrxnDdC09UMjLsrVA9qrdDttXA56GtMC4k StJntDX2x90Lv/kVYLFFl78PG4nU9c4+QhQtZFsMZdGVjxnvEZDuSgpdagXhycMJUmvf WYRw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=wuKcA8jCZXYEFzVqyGru+Ji9llwT33M1Hri8OqwhmGg=; b=kl0W4lt5NrxzhRC5IyyBmfS6hict1aDEECdA2Eqn8d0rCYLk5i8vFG9zHpILJ/Yd1A z7Zlo9x+xtmM38pfhsLyXnaM/D3nc/MeDkyKU/5QJZTuuMAsPOhbVzxDPF/mkpgBQem9 IKcQw8P6+7/n4795sZWdL5hQqSs1wETm631cKqXOy7mjXLE2NpE0QPzypXnlFoVOMVyh q0ugQPMnNIMcIvhuw1M5zh0+1//Gn7dntC4/SHFxqw5dut+LUsI5oZJkjirzi7iHY1K2 oO9a1V3J/sP8Lh39Ahrp5gVXs8lEPG8GhzJmGV/IMSkZ66nZmqq6Gql56gpKI8OIgeSe zWWA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmiNJS93/62eP9hKPLgjfBQi7ZZUWp7/9iprW1F0vbT8sWOnpEZNsfkVSuqdLnBnLzLpaxmRoiXtBnA6koC6eoAoOue7LwuVhKoNYHYJuEHBI/sp07n+eXNhCy4QfXzkcmOI87owHLWbmDdSX5UCSEyvT3VbDvk3EfcaRcYn26cnHnlIWro+68Wz2jh5eOsFmlw+dOY
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.129.201 with SMTP id ny9mr18494989obb.0.1393259748740; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 08:35:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.142.198 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 08:35:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <53063600.4020102@gmail.com>
References: <53063600.4020102@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:35:48 +0000
Message-ID: <CALzYgEe0XrQdKDZN3_dwFLnM87+TXyYRMzj4ZGe5xKi-T_5V+g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eran Messeri <eranm@google.com>
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e015366b46770b304f329904f"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/aXErh-EuqQUxigchPFTuawNWLc4
Cc: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Draft agenda
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:36:23 -0000

I'll be happy to scribe half the session.

As for the agenda, I'd like to suggest discussing handling of private
subdomains<https://code.google.com/p/certificate-transparency/issues/detail?id=20>
.
IMHO while the suggestion in the issue makes sense , it'd benefit from
another review to make sure it would work as intended and covers all cases
CAs are concerned about.

Eran


On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>wrote:

> I've uploaded a first crack at an agenda to
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/89/agenda/agenda-89-trans.
> Please let me know if anything is missing, or if you'd like
> to request some time on the agenda.
>
> I'll be starting discussions on some of these items over
> the next few days.
>
> Also, note that one of the things you can do to help move
> work forward in the IETF is to volunteer to take minutes
> or act as a Jabber scribe during the session.  If anybody
> would like to volunteer now, we'd be grateful.
>
> Melinda
>
> _______________________________________________
> Trans mailing list
> Trans@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
>

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status