Re: [Trans] Policy for adding to IANA registries requested in 6962-bis

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 12 December 2016 15:48 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D31129432 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:48:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xw_4ptSlaK4F for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:48:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com [23.79.238.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79C21129C69 for <trans@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:47:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8ED43340B; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:47:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com [172.27.118.251]) by prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4DCB433402; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:47:58 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1481557678; bh=x9D2eLHtDKGO4hGVqz34c4j+W+tpyJhHQQqpogKRoiI=; l=222; h=From:To:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=aw/p6I2DWloD3vI7y8494IpwergAdfcqVnf28IV1pgvTC/SnLDLJiSnJqIanUDKN1 NHjvCokOenhB/GeoYwLxi9MuEy9D89WVuSuTEAFrSPkDaD+XNoNs2FBM3+M7MnZwUq IeqOK0hBLH1/xg9zS7XoPkNQKMfnA/S2oX6dRPUE=
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-cas3.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.32]) by prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BD81FC98; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:47:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:47:58 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1178.000; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:47:58 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Eran Messeri <eranm@google.com>, "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Trans] Policy for adding to IANA registries requested in 6962-bis
Thread-Index: AQHSVI7ADU1FevbqpkiNSo/b2luXv6EEdQrg
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:47:57 +0000
Message-ID: <e3f13c30a29f46e9a6e29cae6532af44@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <CALzYgEce25Z7tSz6T+kmFQCA+xbgO0ECknV6nE1m55-pey3vrQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALzYgEce25Z7tSz6T+kmFQCA+xbgO0ECknV6nE1m55-pey3vrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.32.252]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/arXTlgLFclNLYt2v7wn7FePdqZI>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Policy for adding to IANA registries requested in 6962-bis
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:48:17 -0000

> In https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/215 I propose the following policies, all based on definitions in RFC5226:

+1 for all.