Re: [Trans] RFC 7320 and draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-24

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Wed, 15 March 2017 20:46 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62E2131837 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:46:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dIwnG69v0job for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22a.google.com (mail-pg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 478CE131828 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id b129so14284642pgc.2 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=fF541DCOnSaQliBB2UA7gLM2C/Siu2fNMqA54QhZyLE=; b=ba+BAPGrIH8UPaP9sTAmJE7CtYE9y3RohJnVbW3M5GfdMHIBV2kHskCNmQGnEXQepz MVRWVPT+myFO6ATX8s6y+nxXia8ZI/hI5Is+NcouEJaa99omB9X+iexPQ0W3I4Xd+kNR KnFZgPE+zbbXXrtxTu4Zs3ek8rHJYz4ugwmzX7RjKzxhWzlnBTsn4B/1TPsxsMC2G1C7 KHEzanquMrSerIHdK+eyE7MLRp6cTroPQ6w8KAjWGOV/MyvR7c2GWp5vWt1aHUeJhhOR G2YfAA5AzHwbAffjXCNoAVmBZ+NUcnx+jXldbiJXuvo+PhaaehjEmKYmqY22nDlb4dKB d04g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=fF541DCOnSaQliBB2UA7gLM2C/Siu2fNMqA54QhZyLE=; b=iVfWq8z0Ic6hK+o7tkW+m3FAlVdjEM3b4JOxyx+4huTJp9eLAr6mlMzpX/WCvEn/s9 P6PnNozPrFWt7lP3Da9I2HwYB09tJz11/8zrhYpJyNg32q5Y7OjmUWObhhcCW2wdgN3P pCP+lBqVg5paQOYW79HQCNV++Fts+ZP3FPE7ifWS7o1dtJ3qj57SFOlz2B8e/CkzaE62 Y9A6DVTRjbTw3NAOt8UUQMJo3P9Sk9wT+k1ymfX5BBd646BkJYkkP16cWPn2WnX8q+Xj Z2jqT3DuW9Es0bciCmwBkLUnueiGllBqvtQXi7I7X6gGNneOylCJJW5/hSyiMQArhFXX gqog==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2IPe8tLjRI0sJwcPOOfwl8KfPVrtzVooQh2P4YFC2f3nQ876XyU0cv65Z+Ae+VAQ==
X-Received: by 10.84.169.227 with SMTP id h90mr7123268plb.155.1489610809168; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Melindas-MacBook-Pro.local (216-67-74-184-radius.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [216.67.74.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v186sm5993449pgv.44.2017.03.15.13.46.48 for <trans@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
To: trans@ietf.org
References: <CABkgnnUescLZ-s0a+TGEhpcHH6E1i=1HhGTRhj8mKa=0q9TkHA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <0f1433b8-84a7-754c-6463-ee73808abf9e@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:46:45 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUescLZ-s0a+TGEhpcHH6E1i=1HhGTRhj8mKa=0q9TkHA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5NGPkHP09WeQg1HsepsBWOFiItUKJuOPH"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/cW2NZ7WFszXJo_SyZjIsVt5WKDo>
Subject: Re: [Trans] RFC 7320 and draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-24
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 20:46:52 -0000

On 3/15/17 12:29 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> I am not following this work, but this and the original RFC 6962 both
> run afoul of the (good) guidance in RFC 7320.
> 
> Has the working group solicited feedback from the HTTP community on
> the use of HTTP in this protocol?

No, we haven't.

For what it's worth, 6962 reflects implementation and
deployment prior to CT having been brought to the IETF
for standardization, so any concerns regarding URL
syntax or HTTP transport in the work being done by this
working group are necessarily limited to the -bis and
related documents.

To be honest, I'm personally not convinced of the applicability
of 7320 in this case but if there's a specific problem it does
need to be discussed.

Melinda