Re: [Trans] Alternate formats for Precertificates

"Robin Alden" <robin@comodo.com> Wed, 26 February 2014 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <robin@comodo.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14CD1A0183 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:39:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.609
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.609 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eMmMDHFKuGfV for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:39:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ian.brad.office.comodo.net (eth5.brad-fw.brad.office.ccanet.co.uk [178.255.87.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6481A0099 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:39:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 17278 invoked by uid 1000); 26 Feb 2014 18:39:33 -0000
Received: from robin2-bradford.comodo.net (HELO Robin2Bradford) (192.168.0.53) by ian.brad.office.comodo.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:39:33 +0000
From: Robin Alden <robin@comodo.com>
To: 'Carl Wallace' <carl@redhoundsoftware.com>, 'Paul Hoffman' <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
References: <CABrd9SSOmEgbTvLNw5bPN2SnKbob800qEecn+tHvZUkrghFcQg@mail.gmail.com> <530E100A.7040503@primekey.se> <530E142A.90007@comodo.com> <530E16CD.6030908@primekey.se> <CABrd9SR1S7Fg5Xs_dkgou3HfF4O_hyzFxW4qS=-2eti7DmGZew@mail.gmail.com> <67380B58-5D8B-4B38-B20B-2FF6769FE94B@vpnc.org> <CF3388E0.11D87%carl@redhoundsoftware.com> <2CABE0AE-46C1-4D7A-BD8F-29BFE6225D3A@vpnc.org> <CF338AE7.11D94%carl@redhoundsoftware.com>
In-Reply-To: <CF338AE7.11D94%carl@redhoundsoftware.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:39:33 -0000
Organization: Comodo CA Ltd.
Message-ID: <061d01cf3322$17c3db50$474b91f0$@comodo.com>
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQLhwbMR9TJNieKi8fP9Ny966UpsgAGh7y8UAk99GAwBCUVilwILaDSzAm5b+P0BdhA2kwGn0HKoAbcpg5eYMHP18A==
Content-Language: en-gb
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="SHA1"; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0618_01CF3322.17955140"
X-Comodo-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on ian.brad.office.comodo.net
X-Comodo-ClamAV-Virus-Program: ClamAV 0.98/18518/Wed Feb 26 15:43:41 2014
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/cwr3-jaeoFZ5LMz87dtWYS1q9K4
Cc: 'Ben Laurie' <benl@google.com>, trans@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Trans] Alternate formats for Precertificates
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:39:40 -0000

> From: Carl Wallace
> Sent: 26 February 2014 17:14
> 
> > Paul Hoffman said..
> >
> >When you say "just use a TBSCertificate", you mean that CT use that
> >instead of a certificate structure, yes?
> 
> Yes.
> 

But I think CT wants the pre-certificate signed by a key which it can
verify that the CA controls, and a signed TBSCertificate is a
Certificate.

Regards
Robin Alden
Comodo