[Trans] Alexey Melnikov's DISCUSS on draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Fri, 30 July 2021 03:53 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77673A1964 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:53:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u4cWS1QTuWcF for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:53:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 647893A196A for <trans@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:53:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4GbYQx6Y0mz2pC; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 05:53:29 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1627617209; bh=cRehc4TI4tCJNdsI9RTW7Vgxwkm8dVI9J7eORiiuDIk=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=cQn45YWlVTcK1qo2ehbaY6J6hIEYjl79pXxCPp5rIg7p6HXZm2RPACrQci4VX7D3q Auwm9S+RxltuSmUDCbdKH5t782kGWs+L/N89sBZHEuc+JDNRO+joUlxZGfAZVr4ztS qnSEFQ115m0nSQYClDEId+uYvg6ZBghujl4JQWbg=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7vpKaqCDiJeN; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 05:53:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 05:53:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 62428D39A5; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 23:53:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E948D39A4; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 23:53:27 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 23:53:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <03314592-ed87-6b52-c6b2-6bfb06eb4fb6@isode.com>
Message-ID: <51d3de41-45dd-e3c-48d4-4bd92dfc613c@nohats.ca>
References: <97FC6C54-5642-4E0B-B6CB-F3231C58D7AF@akamai.com> <CAErg=HG3-TT++aU6mRQ7uyp_d0gLbUWU-3qVBzZ7fdAzHthtPA@mail.gmail.com> <C6F3ECDF-D16A-4BFC-BBF5-14F6577D26D2@akamai.com> <CAErg=HFo3AAV+=-C5wjvmcANF-PFvp+qzSupBJ-60VXsC-otcA@mail.gmail.com> <CAM4esxR_U6DNVnsjrY5B4v1zZRNQMjcz-fiK1iF+dL+3zrw0Rg@mail.gmail.com> <6846A60B-EAD5-4CF7-AFFB-FF9C7FA96895@akamai.com> <03314592-ed87-6b52-c6b2-6bfb06eb4fb6@isode.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/gDuOb4iLVnebvh2FsQY7bpwVNOU>
Subject: [Trans] Alexey Melnikov's DISCUSS on draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 03:53:36 -0000

Alexey,

I see you still have a DISCUSS open, but I believe this item was already
fully resolved:

 	I think this is an important document and I am looking forward to seeing it as a Proposed Standard in the future.
 	However, it has a good number of editorial issues that make the document hard to read and implement.

 	5.  Log Client Messages

 	type:  A URN reference identifying the problem.  To facilitate
 	automated response to errors, this document defines a set of
 	standard tokens for use in the "type" field, within the URN
 	namespace of: "urn:ietf:params:trans:error:".

 	I think you need to register this in <https://www.iana.org/assignments/params/params.xhtml#params-1>

 	Also, can you clarify whether error need an IANA registry?


The error IANA registry is present at, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-40#section-10.1.2

Can you confirm this resolves your DISCUSS?

Paul