Re: [Trans] Tracking implementations

Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> Thu, 31 July 2014 13:36 UTC

Return-Path: <benl@google.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51BC1B280B for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 06:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.38
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.38 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p9EFn6VnmuWo for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 06:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x230.google.com (mail-qg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53C281B280A for <trans@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 06:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id i50so3772908qgf.21 for <trans@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 06:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Iv/+bBV1GGlmr1uBf9I3xLouSsPhTo18+Fh1oVRyTXQ=; b=buN1NDNSNuLMhFRD2sq5MCtCrZFngOiW36usUuz8Pjzota7esLh6TLpFtaFhsH1P6Y 2saWrafluekpugeieueO4EyZNsW2UtAg9rMn80uAR9FucGOZn/aorW26YNNDjlkw7wjx b2lhGcK4iIwaY3DIyo+LivWGQnmK1myRsH4OXoX3pRCBDofXnaZaJ1lJvU2HS/W7xdBF h6T57yaEyezQepCDqYSXdSkgwwzZaUyyGfXLicRU/taHwhJ2Fa9WI9J4QlFw9LrbfGAO zT2UlAzd1zdziIYIDjs4UarHwafltwMPJOc70PM57Wx1ULdKVRWALVSUnEESgTjQtpbr 0QNA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Iv/+bBV1GGlmr1uBf9I3xLouSsPhTo18+Fh1oVRyTXQ=; b=MouS74O9Q9BCwKATYhsX1hCUne73IDOFJyxanCQw8HhTsQ6P5IY9uvuOWOtjRjSAYD hVzJ9STycArzhMl8Hlc6DLiSodVP0U06mMi+q2MyiBpY+w2MrFJasKqW5KWqSTv8U0YV LCXPv1orU0yv0Z/YKhPfvYpKeG83rb6GmtP5187LPB/ROUPXmmfLNw/bGucTE/2DGOQ8 sFk1jz5N8p4sHkmAnAPubrWWAgFCZij2ZoYjGL9GHIBGQwBIkyOju/vqMDFTNS8798lY SoY1jOZ6N9YpKn2IrUk2ag2Rj3R3QZiWlK07Ev5WL+ye5DaRkMf1rKP5ZJ5l/LJvYnEs GL1g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmLgYcDYcef1drPBWgQQrJd94lqJCLkrhVbB7EHo1cYplyOb+AizzbdSybY48mw/4ojByNi
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.105.72 with SMTP id b66mr17076650qgf.30.1406813795878; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 06:36:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.162.15 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 06:36:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53D9600C.6040805@gmail.com>
References: <53D9600C.6040805@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:36:35 -0400
Message-ID: <CABrd9SRO_BYejwAJHfJJYwbKdNZRP_aL2yY1SP==1YxXYgTwXg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/h6OnffINAt-dcunCXj1qU2xleW0
Cc: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Tracking implementations
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:36:39 -0000

On 30 July 2014 17:13, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> wrote:
> During the session last week I was a bit surprised by the number of
> people saying that they were doing implementations, and I think it
> might be useful to get a better handle on that.  If nothing else, it
> helps quite a bit during the publication process if it's known
> that there are interoperable implementations and that we know a little
> bit about them.
>
> So, I'd be grateful if people who've are working on implementations
> and who can discuss them publicly could speak up, let us know the
> status and whether or not you'll be releasing source, and provide a
> pointer to a repo or other documentation if you're able.  Also let
> me know whether or not you'd be willing to have your implementation
> mentioned on a wiki page listing implementations.

Obviously(?) Google has an open source implementation here:
https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency.

We also have two internal production implementations, both of which
share as much code as is feasible with the open source. No current
plan to release source that is not already released.

Feel free to mention them on a wiki page.

>
> Thanks again,
>
> Melinda
>
> _______________________________________________
> Trans mailing list
> Trans@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans