Re: [Trans] Infrastructure for logs?

Dmitry Belyavsky <beldmit@gmail.com> Fri, 18 April 2014 13:20 UTC

Return-Path: <beldmit@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF0061A0158 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 06:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rQ5dRtbRw5oU for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 06:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yh0-x22c.google.com (mail-yh0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95CD61A0152 for <trans@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 06:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yh0-f44.google.com with SMTP id f10so1455194yha.3 for <trans@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 06:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=QGXBEhDJscSyEKReJgNtg4B5YnJgxUo5qshATDwNSXk=; b=qGC25eePqschGx7EE57yB4EORKgMRlyI+n3TsRnLtbAde4GI/pm9/YIyphNejfk4w2 N5/uYtq/AC3x4dRs8uSnD852+Z87vWKY7zWZP1D9xDr15Hk8RP/CqMW1jbLG7+nAvOaB BD0QErTQ1ZpdTv+qayzowquIiMRVJIc7RKFo2DCk4mMLWMOJUvyQHRZ4Jn9ysXQGncTa TxT+9NAG2NBf0wQvYaAgoSsnzofjvNIGGeHXAq3sPyGnMR67rRI7hceee1egZUY3T3tm ba03fNz9bDc0P8blaiNzjA22AJxx8de9L7O/45Rhl12HRpjX+jo6janIqfoLOv/C++P8 h0RQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.46.5 with SMTP id q5mr30180257yhb.21.1397827249624; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 06:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.170.220.193 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 06:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABrd9SQkWwvMb-VLoBLHuew_EV1kdRA0nhUeFLk3tdj2ur9WYg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABrd9SQkWwvMb-VLoBLHuew_EV1kdRA0nhUeFLk3tdj2ur9WYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 17:20:49 +0400
Message-ID: <CADqLbzL78NSc9mawWQCPmFPXcSG7=BCCNnwsfmZVvqArd8H8Ng@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dmitry Belyavsky <beldmit@gmail.com>
To: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d8391abda1c04f7510401
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/hrfyd_IfbYd14iR_jq_z0LqY_Mw
Cc: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>, CABFPub <public@cabforum.org>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Infrastructure for logs?
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:20:55 -0000

Hello Ben,


On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> wrote:

> My team is considering doing some work on the open source log
> implementation to make it less of a reference implementation and more
> something that you could consider running in (or adapting for) a
> production environment.
>
> It would help guide our thinking of those CAs (and others) who are
> considering running logs would give us some hints about the kind of
> production environment they would like to run in. In particular:
>
> 1. Operating systems.
>
> 2. Database managers.
>
> 3. Any other constraints you might have on a production environment.
>
> Public discussion would be useful, but if you would rather tell me
> privately that is also fine. Bear in mind that what we learn will
> probably influence open source code, though that's obviously very
> unlikely to reveal anything about anyone in particular.
>
>
1. Linux (We prefer Debian).
2. PostgreSQL, MySQL?
3. It seems to be not a constraint but there should be a list of
Nagios/Icinga checks for the log instance.

Thank you!
-- 
SY, Dmitry Belyavsky