Re: [Trans] On the worthiness of DNSSEC and PKI (Re: DNSSEC also needs CT)
Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Sat, 10 May 2014 04:37 UTC
Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711581A014D for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 May 2014 21:37:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7OQq848hVrV3 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 May 2014 21:37:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x236.google.com (mail-pd0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33FA1A010F for <trans@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 May 2014 21:37:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f182.google.com with SMTP id v10so4506941pde.27 for <trans@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 May 2014 21:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vt8XYAVSGhq58Li9+JHWZOW9qfYwfIHOI4ruC0bDrXA=; b=xEJH0TmCCRe5LjoaJDS/DQgcrYdC314gkgJAD7yY2HHY8uz/HnocGhSe+/Ogs0iSU7 PLFwxbPIY7pO3/mFkG+qSSaIPF+98l8nHEzJ+zn74wGA5xGJTcqh2oX7ZzzIg0BNS8ZR bgFeqbxdI12zbFXrh4sQwymTZ3cQWoYuHA7I7HxibqOHLGKFECjKg3i8bu/88wK4YlLi Wx33VgsFICfpgX8Gi1oU+rIg3VRQCir0RtnFiN8u8l0977QurriLBNjHjoNGjRKQ4fXa gMd9cwy0VYDi1npjxHrNkEUJA2SkC7EJRrx1lM7S17UiyxmQ0xaudOIdHsWF4imR8Te8 N5VQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.254.198 with SMTP id ak6mr16700925pad.156.1399696646372; Fri, 09 May 2014 21:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spandex.local (63-140-99-143.dynamic.dsl.acsalaska.net. [63.140.99.143]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xg4sm10466289pbb.47.2014.05.09.21.37.24 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 09 May 2014 21:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <536DAD03.6000608@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 20:37:23 -0800
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tao Effect <contact@taoeffect.com>
References: <CAK3OfOjRg3B69WBhcVxCFZBZt3LeOz_F=giqT37+FUPC+OxTwA@mail.gmail.com> <D8E4B721-E4C1-4CC2-8FCF-343EE197ED79@taoeffect.com> <536D9816.1070008@gmail.com> <7719F0ED-7188-4B57-BEE6-245FD0314D36@taoeffect.com> <536DA145.6050305@gmail.com> <A1536ACA-245A-4D29-9A4B-72649C8227AB@taoeffect.com>
In-Reply-To: <A1536ACA-245A-4D29-9A4B-72649C8227AB@taoeffect.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/iy_Xee14aOYruqx-aBW_Gv5drHM
Cc: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Trans] On the worthiness of DNSSEC and PKI (Re: DNSSEC also needs CT)
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 04:37:33 -0000
On 5/9/14 8:07 PM, Tao Effect wrote: > ... OK, I think I did Step 1: "starting a discussion" about the problems > in CT. Right. That's actually off-topic - if there are specific problems in the working group draft, that's a great place to start a discussion. More general discussion of problems with CT would be on-topic for therightkey@ietf.org. Also, to be clear, we are not going to rathole on this. Melinda
- Re: [Trans] On the worthiness of DNSSEC and PKI (… Nico Williams
- Re: [Trans] On the worthiness of DNSSEC and PKI (… Tao Effect
- Re: [Trans] On the worthiness of DNSSEC and PKI (… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Trans] On the worthiness of DNSSEC and PKI (… Tao Effect
- Re: [Trans] On the worthiness of DNSSEC and PKI (… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Trans] On the worthiness of DNSSEC and PKI (… Tao Effect
- Re: [Trans] On the worthiness of DNSSEC and PKI (… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Trans] On the worthiness of DNSSEC and PKI (… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Trans] On the worthiness of DNSSEC and PKI (… Tao Effect