IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Trans] Poll for adoption of working group draft on threat analysisfor CT

Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Tue, 31 March 2015 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D741A872D for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nsUgCqb62TtM for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.1.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDEED1A870D for <trans@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ssh.bbn.com ([192.1.122.15]:42884 helo=COMSEC.home) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1Yd2un-000Osi-4X for trans@ietf.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:37:37 -0400
Message-ID: <551B0591.2080709@bbn.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:37:37 -0400
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: trans@ietf.org
References: <551067E8.1010201@gmail.com> <551A7F7C.2010802@comodo.com>
In-Reply-To: <551A7F7C.2010802@comodo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/jMWaONlONmv6ErorCIO8pIPHT5E>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Poll for adoption of working group draft on threat analysisfor CT
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 20:37:40 -0000

Rob,

> +1 to adopting this document.
thanks
>
> Syntactic mis-issuance detection is a great idea, but IMHO it should 
> be a separate service rather than a component of log servers.
It is as an independent service, which MAY be supported by log servers. 
Monitors might
offer the service too, as a way os declaring what checks they perform on 
behalf of clients.
> Some folks might want to operate a syntactic mis-issuance detection 
> service without having to also run a log server.
agreed.

Steve

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email