Re: [Trans] Fresh issues!

[Melinda Shore <[e-mail]>]

On 3/16/17 2:58 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:
> Melinda: With regard to your questions about what of this needs to be in
> -bis and what could move to a client behaviors document: If we're going
> to have a client behavior document, I would propose we delete Section
> 8.2 entirely in favor of that document (and probably the remainder of
> Section 8 as well).  That section doesn't add much beyond saying "use
> the mechanisms defined above", and that would resolve the CONN issues in
> my batch.

Okay, we'll try to get a sense of how much agreement there
would be to doing so.  The two-part bottleneck on any of this is
whether or not there's consensus that we need a client behavior
draft and whether or not we've got editors who are on top of
client issues.

Also, to reiterate a general principle in this working group, our
expectation is that 6962-bis does not have to be complete but it
does have to be correct.

Melinda