Re: [Trans] [trans] #78 (rfc6962-bis): algorithm agility discussion is inadequate
"trans issue tracker" <trac+trans@tools.ietf.org> Tue, 03 November 2015 01:41 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+trans@tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B67E71B2B53 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 17:41:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nrOiWDzwbHvo for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 17:41:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E22AC1B2B4D for <trans@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 17:41:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:43557 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <trac+trans@tools.ietf.org>) id 1ZtQbG-0002QJ-FZ; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 17:41:26 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: trans issue tracker <trac+trans@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.5
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.5, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis@tools.ietf.org, rob.stradling@comodo.com, benl@google.com, kent@bbn.com, eranm@google.com
X-Trac-Project: trans
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 01:41:26 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/trans/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/78#comment:4
Message-ID: <067.c997cb75842732a2fb6169f1568d5268@tools.ietf.org>
References: <052.225d9e4c8d8c45e468832faf6102e815@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 78
In-Reply-To: <052.225d9e4c8d8c45e468832faf6102e815@tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis@tools.ietf.org, rob.stradling@comodo.com, benl@google.com, kent@bbn.com, eranm@google.com, trans@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+trans@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20151103014132.E22AC1B2B4D@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 17:41:32 -0800
Resent-From: trac+trans@tools.ietf.org
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/l5Cj6IFsvYFhY_63Hwag2ySGpv4>
Cc: trans@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Trans] [trans] #78 (rfc6962-bis): algorithm agility discussion is inadequate
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 01:41:33 -0000
#78: algorithm agility discussion is inadequate Comment (by eranm@google.com): More text about algorithm agility is out for review in: https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/91 -- -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-trans- kent@bbn.com | rfc6962-bis@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: rfc6962-bis | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: Keywords: | -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/78#comment:4> trans <http://tools.ietf.org/trans/>
- [Trans] [trans] #78 (client-behavior): algorithm … trans issue tracker
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #78 (rfc6962-bis): algorithm … trans issue tracker
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #78 (rfc6962-bis): algorithm … trans issue tracker
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #78 (rfc6962-bis): algorithm … Stephen Kent
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #78 (rfc6962-bis): algorithm … Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #78 (rfc6962-bis): algorithm … trans issue tracker
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #78 (rfc6962-bis): algorithm … Stephen Kent
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #78 (rfc6962-bis): algorithm … trans issue tracker
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #78 (rfc6962-bis): algorithm … trans issue tracker
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #78 (rfc6962-bis): algorithm … trans issue tracker
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #78 (rfc6962-bis): algorithm … Stephen Kent
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #78 (rfc6962-bis): algorithm … Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #78 (rfc6962-bis): algorithm … trans issue tracker
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #78 (rfc6962-bis): algorithm … Stephen Kent