Re: [Trans] Draft agenda
Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Mon, 24 February 2014 17:53 UTC
Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63CFE1A0147 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:53:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AcN4vqgQWmpz for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:52:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-x234.google.com (mail-pd0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082C61A010D for <trans@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:52:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f180.google.com with SMTP id y10so967353pdj.25 for <trans@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:52:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ipfKXGsPpHA0VO3WQbV4YTgYEhkaXnv0qkGPJ64UY88=; b=rSwg2wZS+bR69xzBVmPs9OIiBCJm3Zrgh3R//wa7+3oH4RKtXJewOYM3ALDmVAnx/a 1W0leI+Sorq/BQ/4qa23pcnXhI/M3RFmEPUx+T+o06eUcWub45/JzwzGLKoWPi1ncJdt 39qyk2I0iIXqk6Wis5WB01UDf3dY7THXsuOMptC97+z8qY3jjt3k3yAiZe4Yqkz2ybQQ lfZcFVUW3zZGZImhUzzFAAvk/jqc9FEhThDU7CUvgKSCDCAZ77oQJfuOVFuBN7PnK4k+ fGCrfXStb7oE8myDj1bDxSVASFzCaY7DEShBQFcYzWNVlZg/OeM2+j/33Oo5cIaLx6ei V99A==
X-Received: by 10.66.164.104 with SMTP id yp8mr26234439pab.25.1393264377544; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:52:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spandex.local (63-140-68-38-rb2.sol.dsl.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [63.140.68.38]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e6sm2092781pbg.4.2014.02.24.09.52.55 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:52:56 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <530B86F6.5040201@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 08:52:54 -0900
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eran Messeri <eranm@google.com>
References: <53063600.4020102@gmail.com> <CALzYgEe0XrQdKDZN3_dwFLnM87+TXyYRMzj4ZGe5xKi-T_5V+g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALzYgEe0XrQdKDZN3_dwFLnM87+TXyYRMzj4ZGe5xKi-T_5V+g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/lXDwD_A5DNRPSzWfdiHZqehen3U
Cc: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Draft agenda
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:53:00 -0000
On 2/24/14 7:35 AM, Eran Messeri wrote: > I'll be happy to scribe half the session. Excellent - thank you. > As for the agenda, I'd like to suggest discussing handling of private > subdomains > <https://code.google.com/p/certificate-transparency/issues/detail?id=20>. > IMHO while the suggestion in the issue makes sense , it'd benefit from > another review to make sure it would work as intended and covers all > cases CAs are concerned about. That one looks to me like a hairball. Right now it's a MUST in 5280 that a serial number be unique for each certificate issued by a CA. Melinda
- [Trans] Draft agenda Melinda Shore
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Eran Messeri
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Rob Stradling
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Melinda Shore
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Melinda Shore
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Eran Messeri
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Melinda Shore
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Rob Stradling
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Phillip Hallam-Baker
- [Trans] CT for opportunistic STARTTLS in SMTP Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Trans] CT for opportunistic STARTTLS in SMTP Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] CT for opportunistic STARTTLS in SMTP Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Trans] CT for opportunistic STARTTLS in SMTP Trevor Freeman
- Re: [Trans] CT for opportunistic STARTTLS in SMTP Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Trans] CT for opportunistic STARTTLS in SMTP Trevor Freeman
- Re: [Trans] CT for opportunistic STARTTLS in SMTP Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Rob Stradling
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Rob Stradling
- [Trans] running code (was: Re: Draft agenda) Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Carl Wallace
- Re: [Trans] running code (was: Re: Draft agenda) Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] running code Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Trans] running code Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Rob Stradling
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Carl Wallace
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Tomas Gustavsson
- Re: [Trans] running code Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Trans] CT for opportunistic STARTTLS in SMTP Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Rob Stradling
- Re: [Trans] running code (was: Re: Draft agenda) Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Trans] CT for opportunistic STARTTLS in SMTP Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] running code Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] CT for opportunistic STARTTLS in SMTP Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Trans] CT for opportunistic STARTTLS in SMTP Trevor Freeman