[Trans] Ticket 170

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Tue, 09 May 2017 16:51 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43A81294F7 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 May 2017 09:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sRPneSpduBAT for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 May 2017 09:51:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22c.google.com (mail-pg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49CC512945E for <trans@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 May 2017 09:51:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id u187so2568205pgb.0 for <trans@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 May 2017 09:51:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version; bh=xyl59f31lP8SpJ5kSLfVaIgdb6vQFlhAViHJ1GexdB4=; b=Jc+r89uxHF/tQjH3SISd0yQmFdF1+6N+l2fSZFcMRZ5RFbVnV82Es+6ft6MT4R7dkm WX0YnAZJmjGD3Lo4/kUHFw9fX6FRbZzUYUKfXTD83hckmzK9fSlRxDZqAyb4RofoQn19 SyWpUfsdmTbod945CaK4KkBk+1jfTcX7/7KTAC8f/3SNqro9K/JkAp2tWEiZ10hQ2tbP XLviogz1pt/oWecK/H5cnoIKzVjBYWZYM+ReI7FbzbwMiUqijbJ2C8UTkbWCnQ2WfB1I bLK3nW9sZvb8EIfNdl0bUHIxwkDvmyZo6pFwkTklb3vpCRaRgikAeTT4a2jspWEprD8b PrPA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version; bh=xyl59f31lP8SpJ5kSLfVaIgdb6vQFlhAViHJ1GexdB4=; b=DlSNNHL51HAYKTF4eUpvPFSE08lEoKOYp4rkL5yp3EwzmRMQfTK22BSNoWONXv5tgx GyXxHPgpG7ehxZ0DDNK20hFn/wTUz4lT9oFeY63EvngeH631ju9eLBgWjC1Xrr9eOuKr obud4ss6EjjvRqmHAzJHo7Npq2WauC5YKnU2Qr1xW/DMn8jW++EReG+pssgWuOc181nk d0m6tjS842iv309CYkuvYV0qJO1MN3x/3qMQyKS8TuTNP2nRq8XNCdoDWep9/dm46aha WYkiQnKYXcsx/6q0fF1jx7phecQgPwsJ+Tr9S5Mj/h+XDpT0zu1fM1pPrERB37LcyuF7 ylQQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCxM+KNr+nYm7TXltEgU/DD4dErdBMMPcf39Aq8Ym/jfNZVfmiM TePVdTXg8jN15bEzM/E=
X-Received: by 10.98.155.28 with SMTP id r28mr975172pfd.198.1494348659616; Tue, 09 May 2017 09:50:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Melindas-MacBook-Pro.local ([2620:11a:c081:20:5cd2:e060:3f82:f97a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v4sm878032pfa.81.2017.05.09.09.50.58 for <trans@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 May 2017 09:50:58 -0700 (PDT)
To: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4058f163-97f9-2ba3-8730-f2f2e0b0bb5d@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 09:50:57 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mP9OS0dE0BtoqA6dnwiIubMS9nj0GcRqg"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/rqmakAfYB9HnkffCDWi9r09Ic98>
Subject: [Trans] Ticket 170
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 16:51:02 -0000

Hi, all:

We have a disagreement on closing ticket 170
(https://trac.ietf.org/trac/trans/ticket/170),
on the use of distinct keys for signing SCTs and STHs.  Eran proposed
closing it as "wontfix" (i.e. not provide text describing how to use
different keys on the frontend and the backend).  Linus disagreed,
and since he's both a log implementer and operator that carries some
weight.  This needs a bit more discussion, and in particular we
need feedback from people running logs.

Melinda