IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Trans] Compatibility of name redaction and EV

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Wed, 20 August 2014 04:46 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44ABD1A8710 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 21:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2C6JcQS5OYvQ for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 21:46:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x230.google.com (mail-pd0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 173571A870F for <trans@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 21:46:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f176.google.com with SMTP id y10so11143525pdj.21 for <trans@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 21:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VwdYkSPyAW+4PU94QCzqZExerrl0pkdEVvWkpZbE4t4=; b=AndAbiFS/hi1TWHIDoabKNc+BdH6IZ/VnTTViHPlkLNJRzuCM/Lpj9sOZWLn8JY8oA RZRoK7m5mmQ3CwTi1sH1EC2HSkq/AZT52cOiqopIzttoeetcXbcGWJSdN6vpw0jZqPya sMUZqryUYNzOwMAAvnmzLhCIXT3DwmQ+92AotDDmn08o3eBmifeQ7s311OrkZD3ZhHAk uw8Z5jzN8iQcBbvUBvggZmGrBoopwElkrdHeCOB5jnFzcOb1CJ5o8+nUvmQWsOuemQ0b 9nEi6FCPK2fQPxeMYkPYo0Z83N/zR2a7h+oqwqSKxYunf+TcD3odEXrU3m/3PfLaTY2t vbDg==
X-Received: by 10.70.96.193 with SMTP id du1mr45445203pdb.132.1408509981638; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 21:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spandex.local (63-140-77-66-rb3.nwc.dsl.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [63.140.77.66]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k3sm19291715pdb.18.2014.08.19.21.46.20 for <trans@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Aug 2014 21:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53F4281A.2010801@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 20:46:18 -0800
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: trans@ietf.org
References: <CABrd9SQ=mW7DoQUkXGv5M=nuoR1fTFG5N1Qc_PyK+mtm6E6s_A@mail.gmail.com> <53F25A33.5020405@bbn.com> <CABrd9SQcYQCV93CC-1DocNwOrKa0aJVqMaOMVRPWJt3pinvuiA@mail.gmail.com> <53F26610.8000608@bbn.com> <CABrd9SQWyNjvHdZXJ_eZCg4iFtdUxrWDQL1uVuAM+xnvdMCdFA@mail.gmail.com> <53F39933.8030706@bbn.com> <CABrd9SRXC+n4D=L9CcxuhXuQBj0Ff=KrW81r_J8ZWAurxUL1xA@mail.gmail.com> <53F3B6C4.2000108@bbn.com>
In-Reply-To: <53F3B6C4.2000108@bbn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/teEB6dkxfS7xwsj0IZVRU3LfegI
Subject: Re: [Trans] Compatibility of name redaction and EV
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 04:46:25 -0000

On 8/19/14 12:42 PM, Stephen Kent wrote:
> As for a public statement wrt ignoring WG consensus (in an implementation)
> by a doc "editor" it strikes me as very unusual, if not unique, based on
> my 28 years of IETF participation.

This has not been an issue yet, and to be honest I do not anticipate
that it will become one.  We will deal with should it come up, but
I'd rather go forward with a minimum of antagonism and with a continued
focus on moving the document along.

Melinda

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email