Re: [Trans] Mozilla's basic take on Binary Transparency
Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Wed, 29 March 2017 15:35 UTC
Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF015129422 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 08:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jWeRS0yqCsYf for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 08:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x236.google.com (mail-wr0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C00A129411 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 08:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x236.google.com with SMTP id k6so14230033wre.2 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 08:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dCrPxIPXPJLAh4BvdWoze3D8lJTnl5+n4vM3L9eEy60=; b=iXS/mC05+D2D7ejCLv1+g3rPMA16qRdd2wHirNV4Pjl+dTN+V/BBTmDm9rmcZ27Yga nkJxXu/cKRhamCnhDlo9TtKxKXliuuR3z7g0PSwcLCnFiPvRnS7w3cWWQZGDUEhLTKO9 K4vN0XhEOMtxd+MEOVuZDzdQH24xLVhWWfh23WxMecGP35zGJ4+Xt6YpqhPnOcEQIcSf YYDVWlhO0uUJD0pjsVE5XGwUtJMLY73xZvvgTMAKkeBMa35PsB8FVWSe17o+xMxsMJwq ZyGLLYYV4QTFsneCI9doQO3sZFjPIKHRm2sSgoDNGRa1k7brmKlCTXpWRBH47sDcLFCz SbgA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dCrPxIPXPJLAh4BvdWoze3D8lJTnl5+n4vM3L9eEy60=; b=o0RSgciE14SIll4BxKH+95xyKCcQ2kMXUHRtgjd2yhLshRoILPYx9Kj/KAzpiQkwE9 cfCk1ULWNeiUK1THm0h3fWyVAFsOlmIHsVGtm9A2cto++11H6dYjuVxF+HcuWlyYovGc tAqyzxI1HMKA5V8zlIazgh1V8MkT/bq/8MUwzHRUGXtqGRT0oVz26byrB6oRYA1N8hO+ PUi3AYhzMCMvJRFKwasrToJlzLt8JcqwFRIA3xcAL3Uf9hx9mLAaxl7rT/EXCuY/FjBL mzkfd6jW2Nafw3plep5LzvTDY87BxLjdDMsUYggld9Sfj18lAdVhzSx3nAR+UVihQ2xE bylQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H18XMTZRrHHJB7Czuxmv5A9gU4kmnfwnzdtbL0mK4Ts+JrgEZG9B8h+BANPFaEtsfiaHGD6+fNGXNYypw==
X-Received: by 10.223.169.70 with SMTP id u64mr993705wrc.187.1490801731761; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 08:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.40.69 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 08:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABrd9SSbBV3zjR-+fY6P8P0mpKbceGoGOSKss6n13v-3NS=+Gg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL02cgQ5MR6o2wWu=NUpneJ8UPmqxkFmBY4Y-+vCUtxvVCBu5g@mail.gmail.com> <CABrd9SSbBV3zjR-+fY6P8P0mpKbceGoGOSKss6n13v-3NS=+Gg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:35:31 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgRz4BWhYamkPMNtBQBg++adgh-CrWW8ZnDC8mgyBvzv5Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
Cc: Trans <trans@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045cf46ea72d28054be05306"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/xYdPPrFzFW3nRAuJknqVIFB-DP0>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Mozilla's basic take on Binary Transparency
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 15:35:42 -0000
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 7:48 AM, Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> wrote: > > > On 28 March 2017 at 20:21, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> wrote: > >> As I said at the mic, there's some work going on at Mozilla to implement >> a form of Binary Transparency, leveraged on top of CT. Here's the outline: >> >> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Binary_Transparency >> > > Cool! Are you planning to build this from scratch, or use Trillian ( > https://github.com/google/trillian)? > I'm no longer in a position to speak for Mozilla, but I think the idea was not to deploy any new logs, but instead just to use the CT logs that exist. --Richard > >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Trans mailing list >> Trans@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans >> >> >
- [Trans] Mozilla's basic take on Binary Transparen… Richard Barnes
- Re: [Trans] Mozilla's basic take on Binary Transp… Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] Mozilla's basic take on Binary Transp… Richard Barnes
- Re: [Trans] Mozilla's basic take on Binary Transp… Ben Laurie