[Trans] Recent updates to draft 21 of 6962-bis

Eran Messeri <eranm@google.com> Mon, 05 December 2016 11:05 UTC

Return-Path: <eranm@google.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 347261299EB for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 03:05:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AsfjSown1JCn for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 03:05:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wj0-x22e.google.com (mail-wj0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c01::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E6E51299C4 for <trans@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 03:05:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wj0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id tg4so31380036wjb.1 for <trans@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 03:05:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0mngVROGbak2wzBkudW/ivnynmf55kcazlP9YilnJEE=; b=NONRSiEv6xke4c7vkximCiUpbopKfON0ap7X3615Z1CBWnlOZLo3Nm9ze3VCTBEiwS SHEkVqNQBHampAgVUQdzyeRHC4XTMXCvwb8MspUk/riL331QwDo0TyhoOraNqzARA6ZF YJIjr1Ss7WlAYBRY79+P3w1HCotclgoB9rRRqrXGIH+OUECSbl8HYLgeVVh5cj5VHjml 5PwO/z/ZiY+oSnhpB5jVpgzPO5DSMjyPLF5DhnZR2SENp2JEGS0MWBkQ+IbA6Fn0ub/b TEZWQO4vIJeNd/UAO+yNwaubY2ytvhSkcMM714icLZr1aQjbb2tHx7czvbkouR3NEa+m k1fw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0mngVROGbak2wzBkudW/ivnynmf55kcazlP9YilnJEE=; b=FiA5xinIO2vE821f4EvYYg546kMyOEEj/CJeW6EAvMxw3mCQeqwLJpCRrUXLUsc/R4 CcUkkXpceAcNYiklKVRmidieWCOoWV/uGUVdur6P1SXBkuxU3y2QxISuJ/W9tXtpmTy7 AnQ+HZfzGMb8zUJDiEBC4n2EDxEqKnj14jXUk+pcBcc+nFTxg8Q4+9fd5AvP1gdD8ESZ 5HdQA9QX5gztRxy9ci7DYpW9hwhnYkRz9undqt0NaUlWquXEsH7LrG6bgCbTqGXH5VcK 6et1ZXYm8yiBENk9DmR3cSge1HOJZorY6hu+yQWPw1PhxmUrB5Us4pWUmChu6eK7QJ2q XRaQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00lf+Qz2QaCSHtVqEHlCr9LMnvh48QxpKr5/4cO2HDsb9/3w3BsIa6EX7GMDq1cSCnQvDrGiRM+SF/gDIt/
X-Received: by 10.194.149.143 with SMTP id ua15mr58814495wjb.48.1480935917677; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 03:05:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.31.21 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 03:04:46 -0800 (PST)
From: Eran Messeri <eranm@google.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 11:04:46 +0000
Message-ID: <CALzYgEfq=1x6TEMpwP5cS-SeS6HHLw=btwnnp+myGNaTLpJgdg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0122897c4f54060542e7432e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/yNHfI50huEyh8kwNlFhnIo-jfys>
Subject: [Trans] Recent updates to draft 21 of 6962-bis
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 11:05:26 -0000

A few changes were made to draft 21 of 6962-bis to address Paul Wouters'
comments as he was doing the shepherds write-up:
* A few references to obsolete RFCs were replaced with the newer versions
<https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/commit/823855217740d14d5e2d293fcf9a65df2727f125>
.
* RFC6962-bis is explicitly deprecating RFC6962
<https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/commit/ff7e24caca50a68a394b987d70f71c3568906972>
.
* Title has been changed to reflect this is Certificate Transparency V2
<https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/commit/ebadc0be42e844acb56ece616f31df77ddb7d71e>
.
* An outline of the differences from RFC6962 has been added to the
introduction
<https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/209>.
* The IANA section was incomplete - particularly, missing repositories'
names, which were added
<https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/208>.

Note: The act of committing text changes to the GitHub repo does not make
them final - this is just the authors' workflow. Any issue with the draft
should be filed on the trans issue tracker
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/trans/report>, we'll address it and the chairs
will close if we have addressed the workgroup's concerns properly.

Regards,
Eran