Re: [Trigtran] FW: [dhcwg] Announce: BoF Proposal: Detecting Network Attachment

> Hi Spencer,
> 
>> I'm trading e-mail with Greg Daley, and I do believe there is a linkage,
>> although DNA is focused below transport - they are more about address
>> management, for instance, than about transport notification. I look forward
>> to sitting in on their BoF in Vienna.
> 
> Definately some relations, esp. when viewing the (sordid) history
> of Trigtran (aka l2 triggers).

It'd be useful to separate some of the terms here. TRRIGTRAN is not same as
l2 triggers.

The linkage between TRIGTRAN and DNA is the link-layer triggers. Both are
(potential) consumers of link-layer triggers. TRIGTRAN uses link-layer
triggers for enhancing transport protocols. DNA can use these triggers to
expedite the network attachment discovery (with increased confidence).
Another consumer of the triggers if the FMIP work.

Alper

> 
>> Thanks for bringing this to the attention of the mailing list - I was off
>> the net for a week in New Mexico (there are still some places that don't
>> have phones or cell coverage)...
> 
> I'm not sure that is a bad thing.
> 
> John
> _______________________________________________
> Trigtran mailing list
> Trigtran@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trigtran
> 

_______________________________________________
Trigtran mailing list
Trigtran@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trigtran