[trill] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-trill-rfc6439bis-04: (with COMMENT)

"Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 19 January 2017 12:43 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148482982098.10352.9816816043381207445.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 04:43:40 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/-E1Yi5WbfpAbfd6aB90Z7RkwXcw>
Cc: trill-chairs@ietf.org, shares@ndzh.com, draft-ietf-trill-rfc6439bis@ietf.org, trill@ietf.org
Subject: [trill] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-trill-rfc6439bis-04: (with COMMENT)

Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-trill-rfc6439bis-04: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-rfc6439bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------


- section 6: is port-shutdown a new potential DoS vector?
Shouldn't that be noted here and/or in section 9?

[trill] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-i… Stephen Farrell
Re: [trill] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on dra… Donald Eastlake