Re: [trill] Consensus Call: draft-ietf-trill-oam-req

Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> Fri, 26 October 2012 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <narten@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150C121F860F for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UhfFn9LPXcyx for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from e7.ny.us.ibm.com (e7.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.137]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F8AC21F85D5 for <trill@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from /spool/local by e7.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for <trill@ietf.org> from <narten@us.ibm.com>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:14:36 -0400
Received: from d01dlp03.pok.ibm.com (9.56.250.168) by e7.ny.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.107) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:14:34 -0400
Received: from d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (d01relay05.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.237]) by d01dlp03.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38CE7C90041 for <trill@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:14:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id q9QGEWss335314 for <trill@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:14:33 -0400
Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id q9QGESDr016158 for <trill@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:14:29 -0600
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com ([9.80.28.55]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id q9QGEOF3015744 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:14:26 -0600
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (8.14.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id q9QGEKNZ021738; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:14:20 -0400
Message-Id: <201210261614.q9QGEKNZ021738@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, trill@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <201210261547.q9QFlD4f021574@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
References: <CAF4+nEE1vn+oRi9w4Ra0EjQsFrdJu4TO605Vu0=KAyNuio8N3A@mail.gmail.com> <201210261547.q9QFlD4f021574@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> message dated "Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:47:13 -0400."
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:14:20 -0400
From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER
x-cbid: 12102616-5806-0000-0000-00001B11AE98
Subject: Re: [trill] Consensus Call: draft-ietf-trill-oam-req
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 16:14:38 -0000

Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> writes:

> I also note that Don Eastlake had a number of comments that don't seem
> to have been picked up in the revised version. (I noted some of the
> same editorial issues.)

Let me clarify.  Most were addressed, But there were a couple of NITs
that apparently got missed, including ones I ran across in the revised
version. The substantive ones were addressed.

Thomas