Re: [trill] Any comments on Coordinated Multicast Trees (CMT) for TRILL - draft-ietf-trill-cmt-00

"Varun Shah (varshah)" <varshah@cisco.com> Thu, 16 August 2012 18:32 UTC

Return-Path: <varshah@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78B921F85D0; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EQIXfqSo+X9t; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:32:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866D521F846A; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:32:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=16391; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1345141966; x=1346351566; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=D5w4ur27ksqoyegC7+y96xNkjlFlGEEEP4+JrKXIsy0=; b=iGsOWrL6FKhjFtlFPil2F6OzMx3eU/I0pGEF8MvglQMQkccuRMX2Kwz/ L+RPDXO6oRLyAxxSBD2OhxmBDbCKmHz89PQQXNcwDHdHRNY9hnxsySRcK HAodgmIyHGBiDorlxoTO/gL5TmT5Yh3fydc3IxX+xg00tyxUpiyBLZnDW U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAFAFM8LVCtJXHA/2dsb2JhbABFgkq3Y4EHgiABAQEEAQEBDwEaQQsSAQgRAwEBASguCxQJCAIEAQ0FCRIHh2sLmjygQosKGoY9A5VPjiyBZoJfgV8
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.77,780,1336348800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="109339936"
Received: from rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com ([173.37.113.192]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Aug 2012 18:32:45 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com [173.36.12.89]) by rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7GIWjnk004563 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:32:45 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x05.cisco.com ([169.254.11.223]) by xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com ([173.36.12.89]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:32:44 -0500
From: "Varun Shah (varshah)" <varshah@cisco.com>
To: "Rohit Watve (rwatve)" <rwatve@cisco.com>, Mingui Zhang <zhangmingui@huawei.com>, Sunny Rajagopalan <sunny.rajagopalan@us.ibm.com>, Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>
Thread-Topic: [trill] Any comments on Coordinated Multicast Trees (CMT) for TRILL - draft-ietf-trill-cmt-00
Thread-Index: AQHNe92GUY9E7Ktpw0+6ZI+ygH8mTw==
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:32:44 +0000
Message-ID: <CC527A2B.15FFC%varshah@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <56285561394EF84F8B369395C9D0265607A4BB@xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616
x-originating-ip: [10.155.130.132]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19120.000
x-tm-as-result: No--42.105900-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CC527A2B15FFCvarshahciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "trill-bounces@ietf.org" <trill-bounces@ietf.org>, "trill@ietf.org" <trill@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [trill] Any comments on Coordinated Multicast Trees (CMT) for TRILL - draft-ietf-trill-cmt-00
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:32:47 -0000

I have read the draft and support it for the WG last call.

Thanks,
-Varun

From: "Rohit Watve (rwatve)" <rwatve@cisco.com<mailto:rwatve@cisco.com>>
Date: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 7:12 PM
To: Mingui Zhang <zhangmingui@huawei.com<mailto:zhangmingui@huawei.com>>, Sunny Rajagopalan <sunny.rajagopalan@us.ibm.com<mailto:sunny.rajagopalan@us.ibm.com>>, Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org<mailto:nordmark@acm.org>>
Cc: "trill-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:trill-bounces@ietf.org>" <trill-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:trill-bounces@ietf.org>>, "trill@ietf.org<mailto:trill@ietf.org>" <trill@ietf.org<mailto:trill@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [trill] Any comments on Coordinated Multicast Trees (CMT) for TRILL - draft-ietf-trill-cmt-00

I have read the draft and it solves the RPF issues in case of active-active edge.
I support it in WG last call.

Thanks
Rohit

From: trill-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:trill-bounces@ietf.org> [mailto:trill-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf Of Mingui Zhang
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 5:54 PM
To: Sunny Rajagopalan; Erik Nordmark
Cc: trill-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:trill-bounces@ietf.org>; trill@ietf.org<mailto:trill@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [trill] Any comments on Coordinated Multicast Trees (CMT) for TRILL - draft-ietf-trill-cmt-00


I had read this draft.



IMO, the updated version focus on the specific RPFC issue in active-active multi-homing. The failure recovery from links fails  can be regarded as another common issue of active-active multi-homing, which may  be handled in a separate ID.

Thanks,
Mingui

From: trill-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:trill-bounces@ietf.org> [mailto:trill-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sunny Rajagopalan
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 6:28 AM
To: Erik Nordmark
Cc: trill-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:trill-bounces@ietf.org>; trill@ietf.org<mailto:trill@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [trill] Any comments on Coordinated Multicast Trees (CMT) for TRILL - draft-ietf-trill-cmt-00

I had sent out comments on this a while back, and none of them have been addressed.
To summarize the issues:
1) What happens when one of the CE-rbridge links fails? The draft doesn't talk about this scenario. I listed the possible solutions in my earlier email; are the authors planning to adopt one of them, or do they have another fix in mind?

2) The solution doesn't work if the CE switches are interconnected, but this is but this is not documented in the draft. What happens if they get interconnected accidentally? What is the process for recovery? This needs to be discussed in the draft.
More details here:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill/current/msg04984.html




From:        Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org<mailto:nordmark@acm.org>>
To:        "trill@ietf.org<mailto:trill@ietf.org>" <trill@ietf.org<mailto:trill@ietf.org>>
Date:        08/15/2012 03:14 PM
Subject:        [trill] Any comments on Coordinated Multicast Trees (CMT) for TRILL        - draft-ietf-trill-cmt-00
Sent by:        trill-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:trill-bounces@ietf.org>
________________________________




We are trying to understand if this document is getting close to WG last
call, but we don't know how many have read the document.

If you have reviewed the document, please let us know.
If not, this might be a good time to review the document and provide
comments.

Thanks,
   Erik and Donald
_______________________________________________
trill mailing list
trill@ietf.org<mailto:trill@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill