[trill] Splitting draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Thu, 10 March 2016 04:17 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A91E12DD81; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 20:17:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8ly88QAVnL3F; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 20:17:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22d.google.com (mail-ob0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6738E12DD7B; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 20:17:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id m7so68748736obh.3; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 20:17:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nnpc/KxfTwPBWOxouJXzX+DGp9XX2E4x0gOzt//2LAk=; b=k/gzPSMZufIhzESrwXVo72stFvV15NVREX45Gn7/TPACsYkkupeFRsP2W2/HKOi6qy jc3onK7gcIxgp8irpoGUbckaryANxrQYwd8LzXKvg5OA1MDTveIbhPb21L7sSaO+zccr mv32qoDZIRvlljTln2qANqB3KZFXao5ocMHTr4qx647P74QzdekXEAGVTFiPdk8DDsAk NkeHr/gKCPNRqmjYS+yGivxYN4savrVKSOjRf8jl1O4LY6eamhjxGdxTrSSUB+mCxcUR 1LCgBa21FILWyOb3Isi5j87tAkbjsx6RPz3Yl+6UhK3+HcskfIdsXm2Hj8srEqiMpGwm 4mJg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nnpc/KxfTwPBWOxouJXzX+DGp9XX2E4x0gOzt//2LAk=; b=BhYBDOSdGR4qkPnFdZR+8lTs9W5cGix0WXcLkWKyjRKlkc/dcyD3zCmzsk4AMNTvxH BT7aoHbIdmsqAP7vtEx5s0EEXUUTSwfLzEPYNoCzW2CyaJ5Vj8Be7ogh8DrFHHbOD7GQ Ii6PLvAg6ABWT16GG5PO75lY8bh9uM/KTaua5dZ50puAbt+B5l9QLCmUwqqWcprmiEfe yKjYZ/1AYrhlQc4guoqq1u00NPBCmwypNH2ChmJZ8KS9CTvvVNpWG6uFy+P1rSe5BT0+ 3SOGtEdYdEXNBHFmOWcKunmsAmZgOoIebni+VulSCACe6XZMkuG/PWJq/7NHCvGey77m rSlA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJK6eOHGN/w2e2CHFGABf1Auvo3hB792/6G07OkCYpBrDris+ZsG8WUo4NcjMyYGhMklPYGmb5qVAqpUg==
X-Received: by 10.60.33.232 with SMTP id u8mr814977oei.51.1457583420760; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 20:17:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.77.9 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 20:16:46 -0800 (PST)
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 23:16:46 -0500
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEFmCB47ODEzo-LAm0tWnqDBBR+xRMjB18i8te0fZpGZYA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "trill@ietf.org" <trill@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/25wBZ-7L2T0HlcrSixro8MsjoPE>
Cc: "trill-chairs@ietf.org" <trill-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [trill] Splitting draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trill/>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 04:17:03 -0000

Hi,

Based on an early Security Directorate I received on
draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel, I have been working on the security
component of that draft, particularly things like group keying for
multi-destination messages.

Except for the above security maters, this draft is quite far along
and has, for example, gone through WG Last Call. The channel-tunnel
draft is also needed to support
draft-ietf-trill-directory-assist-mechanisms; however, only pairwise
(known unicast) is actually needed for the directory-assist-mechanisms
draft since it is to protect pull directory messages.

So, my plan is to split out the group-keyed multi-destination security
from trill-channel-tunnel into a new draft-ietf-trill-group-keying-00
draft with the intent that the rest of trill-channel-tunnel can
continue moving forward while the new group-keying draft will have to
go through a new WG Last Call, etc.

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com