[trill] Query on rbridgeSnoopingPortEntry in draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-mib

wenyu zou <nkzouwenyu@gmail.com> Mon, 08 October 2012 12:52 UTC

Return-Path: <nkzouwenyu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C5721F877F for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 05:52:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CNXwG4C6-J1f for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 05:52:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yh0-f44.google.com (mail-yh0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1E821F8783 for <trill@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 05:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yh0-f44.google.com with SMTP id 56so871711yhq.31 for <trill@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 05:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=1BmaixxtMq3NImqdeSpV5HRS3Enfk8qC3iN++eDtPH4=; b=BB4W1oki/iyK7foIp56ZYypVCZ9jN0NlwoMTkR76Onea6JO9/9xwCVeIhEV0ypu1YR 5xuLwi10+1MSLcVM26FSSC6rXUyrFnCf/hsAxOhVcMaN1at7tqg6oId0hf0+CwicKQHx 1fxow3Fx/tdTqMgaJTuNlaS6dTavVhvh5Jtjca8J2aj/N2Te0Q9vf+4NNz87rVqGeMfr FNnRCi9Y6xcPo9VxX9IWoMwBlZlSJ806sRzpE5IbG5i6UGbHad6hSBAYHr58mFiUD+Pt 6cy51wih2cgf5tOKBZpbxF+E/S2Gv4hzhMLirf4+Ru4TVsf5+sg98BSTzO5yyjzy2aB7 QRyA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.73.198 with SMTP id v46mr15982357yhd.80.1349700740551; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 05:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.147.157.35 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 05:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 20:52:20 +0800
Message-ID: <CA+7+8TSqrW7vuHneeVzyi1g7Wcy9YYuubMV2WecB71po8+1CdA@mail.gmail.com>
From: wenyu zou <nkzouwenyu@gmail.com>
To: trill@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: [trill] Query on rbridgeSnoopingPortEntry in draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-mib
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 12:52:21 -0000

Hi Authors,
    I have a questions about rbridgeSnoopingPortEntry in
draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-mib, which is indexed by rbridgeBasePort. For
one port, it maybe have many Multicast Routers in different VLANs. The
current structure of rbridgeSnoopingPortEntry set a limitation that
there is only one Multicast Router for one port. Why don't
rbridgeSnoopingPortEntry indexed by rbridgeVlanIndex like
rbridgeSnoopingAddrEntry?

Thanks.
Regards,
wenyu