Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-dunbar-trill-directory-assisted-edge-05.txt as a WG document?
zhai.hongjun@zte.com.cn Mon, 18 June 2012 02:25 UTC
Return-Path: <zhai.hongjun@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C01221F85FF; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 19:25:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -96.239
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-96.239 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100, WEIRD_QUOTING=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7TzgLkw3th19; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 19:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx6.zte.com.cn [95.130.199.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F1821F85FD; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 19:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.17.100] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 286201455586978; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:21:54 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.30.3.21] by [192.168.168.16] with StormMail ESMTP id 29378.7869373201; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:25:08 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse02.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id q5I2P3JS052017; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:25:03 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from zhai.hongjun@zte.com.cn)
In-Reply-To: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F63393DA8C@dfweml506-mbx>
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: C2E2B575:ADF72947-48257A21:000CADA9; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.6 March 06, 2007
Message-ID: <OFC2E2B575.ADF72947-ON48257A21.000CADA9-48257A21.000D7217@zte.com.cn>
From: zhai.hongjun@zte.com.cn
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:24:56 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2012-06-18 10:25:04, Serialize complete at 2012-06-18 10:25:04
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 000D721548257A21_="
X-MAIL: mse02.zte.com.cn q5I2P3JS052017
Cc: trill-bounces@ietf.org, Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu>, "Radia@alum.mit.edu" <Radia@alum.mit.edu>, Sam Aldrin <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com>, Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>, "trill@ietf.org" <trill@ietf.org>, 'Igor Gashinsky' <igor@yahoo-inc.com>
Subject: Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-dunbar-trill-directory-assisted-edge-05.txt as a WG document?
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 02:25:17 -0000
I have read the draft. As a framework informational draft, it's fine. I support adopting it as a WG draft. Thanks, Zhai Hongjun """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Protocol Development Dept.VI, Central R&D Institute, ZTE Corporation No. 68, Zijinghua Road, Yuhuatai District, Nanjing, P.R.China, 210012 Zhai Hongjun Tel: +86-25-52877345 Email: zhai.hongjun@zte.com.cn """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com> 发件人: trill-bounces@ietf.org 2012-06-16 00:28 收件人 Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu>, Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org> 抄送 Sam Aldrin <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com>, 'Igor Gashinsky' <igor@yahoo-inc.com>, "Radia@alum.mit.edu" <Radia@alum.mit.edu>, "trill@ietf.org" <trill@ietf.org> 主题 Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-dunbar-trill-directory-assisted-edge-05.txt as a WG document? Thanks to Anoop and Sam's opinion on this draft. This draft initially had technical content, e.g. the detailed mechanism to achieve Pull model and Push model. As we peel the onion and explore more details of the mechanisms, a lot more options for the detailed mechanisms were mentioned to achieve the goal. It will be a huge document if all the options are included. Therefore, the TRILL WG chairs suggested to remove the technical content and make the draft as framework informational draft. After WG agree to general framework, multiple drafts can be written to describe various options and debate on which one is suitable or all being optional, etc. I am fine with re-spinning the draft by changing the name to "draft-trill-directory-framework-requirement". What do people think? Linda Dunbar > -----Original Message----- > From: trill-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:trill-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Anoop Ghanwani > Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 7:36 PM > To: Erik Nordmark > Cc: trill@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-dunbar-trill-directory- > assisted-edge-05.txt as a WG document? > > I think this is an interesting problem/solution, > but I think it falls short in discussing how the > directory should be created and what protocol > should be used for the directory server. > > Implementing something like this would mean > that ARP/ND messages would all have to be > forwarded in software (otherwise hosts would > have a problem creating their ARP caches), > which is not mentioned in the document. > > Anoop > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org> > wrote: > > > > <http://http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dunbar-trill-directory- > assisted-edge-05> > > > > We've discussed earlier versions of this document in the WG in the > past, and > > it seems like useful information for a technique that helps with ARP > and ND > > scaling. It does not include any protocol changes or extensions. > > > > The document is intended as an informational document (it says > "Intended > > status: Standard Track" but that is incorrect) explaining how > directories > > can fit into TRILL. > > > > Note that there is claimed IPR associated with the draft: > > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1788/> > > > > Please send comments to the TRILL list before June 27. > > > > Thanks, > > Erik > > _______________________________________________ > > trill mailing list > > trill@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill > _______________________________________________ > trill mailing list > trill@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill _______________________________________________ trill mailing list trill@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
- [trill] Should we adopt draft-dunbar-trill-direct… Erik Nordmark
- Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-dunbar-trill-di… Anoop Ghanwani
- Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-dunbar-trill-di… Sam Aldrin
- Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-dunbar-trill-di… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-dunbar-trill-di… Radia Perlman
- Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-dunbar-trill-di… Yizhou Li
- Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-dunbar-trill-di… hu.fangwei
- Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-dunbar-trill-di… zhai.hongjun
- Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-dunbar-trill-di… david.black
- Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-dunbar-trill-di… Mingui Zhang
- Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-dunbar-trill-di… Naveen Nimmu
- Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-dunbar-trill-di… Tissa Senevirathne (tsenevir)
- Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-dunbar-trill-di… Russ White
- Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-dunbar-trill-di… Donald Eastlake
- [trill] draft-dunbar-trill-directory-assisted-edg… Erik Nordmark