Re: [trill] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-trill-rfc6439bis-04: (with COMMENT)

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 21 February 2017 21:42 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F85129CF2; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 13:42:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9vAKntZLeerS; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 13:42:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb0-x235.google.com (mail-yb0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA9B41296FC; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 13:42:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb0-x235.google.com with SMTP id n76so17587662ybg.3; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 13:42:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=q0gSVQgU6VLP9VzvwJ5mm8voHTBpPrePL8aSp3sXJRY=; b=R8s3g5BLnvTWKwdTwOAxpKuMw3EqMiPdJAGlM/z21MFDVG+6R1eNrSBfZzSj/tgDdA PMztzp+BUn0YU2AcSx8QMMn+t4ZFZCkbBOjZRrN/htqGKLqDQvgivVnsLu0Fx7f+678K McdUotzcsPOt34btvxNx1XMqtVAVex7o8I/vCskFfccBX7YkbkYaFnKt8P3E+ws/AKy7 dNJjEVuNduF4TY3YEeLAZvpLmG/g9tdC2WVRjPNcr6NbZVGVfC468vy5bVT/xYjCEaZh qiYyQh8Kl/DTh2vVki5XC8i6v4yrpz0rXx1iOaeNtfUWxcswJAAUVGaeUcSQIVuQwm1a kQdQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=q0gSVQgU6VLP9VzvwJ5mm8voHTBpPrePL8aSp3sXJRY=; b=g56r34IxLjun6k0FbdDMHr1IS12iDyEE0DPuBiKG6dMtLs56uZwZvFCDXnbQWJaLSa b8mCAps2e3lq8SucyZ2ZXlaLRmNeVUXpY/iBzhQ9Tp3XDak24VPJ3VWVrzWu2koDNxpb /pNvyRcJCfF+hPFjga+NAxbQu7MB1KEamOJEbPZPmQ6RNQ9NfCeLZqg/F//ekNZ6MLfl cci2v9Ywaget/fBnj1qPl9XagStq/WgspSOUrfanzZ2sllL47W2+tDy95KCV7SwIBQMU sqBYdDnDfSGgWA4MziA5qzEUep9TJKcuoqZJ/SU8pnS2VTXDFEdIVSRn100Ngp63TKmE TStQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39k8+tnOvOF7+LR+5WFZlmnpbIl2D4e8so54XM15WDFEuQG1e1LVs+U3Wpy6gS1cE4rQWdRHzg6wJdZanQ==
X-Received: by 10.37.108.137 with SMTP id h131mr21569309ybc.12.1487713372987; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 13:42:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.234.9 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 13:42:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.37.234.9 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 13:42:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEF7BsvDxuQnu+t2wjxvZgR8m6sDS8R1pfzz_Q5BZqRTfA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <148461258839.22482.5195721834167205640.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAF4+nEGGbbGN0xG_=bLAMVxrd5UMLKARSeo++3j_a++3dQA4-w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-dcDhiY5hDQYPEkWAniUcGBqcP49VBHBYNHqEu1a0uGiw@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4+nEF7BsvDxuQnu+t2wjxvZgR8m6sDS8R1pfzz_Q5BZqRTfA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 15:42:52 -0600
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-eEfzCNMSBJqSqgHcFTE=iNST7C3kX2Rc-S55TAtpmagQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1148997e1fee7c05491143f1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/6Thu1u86zFBNsQMWl1H7sZ6xnNM>
Cc: draft-ietf-trill-rfc6439bis@ietf.org, "trill-chairs@ietf.org" <trill-chairs@ietf.org>, iesg@ietf.org, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, trill@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [trill] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-trill-rfc6439bis-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trill/>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 21:42:55 -0000

Hi, Donald,

On Feb 21, 2017 13:30, "Donald Eastlake" <d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Spencer,

Version -05, just posted, is intended to resolve your comments.


Thanks for that.

Spencer


Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com


On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF
<spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Donald,
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Spencer,
>>
>> Thanks for the comments. See below
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Spencer Dawkins
>> <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
>> > draft-ietf-trill-rfc6439bis-04: No Objection
>> >
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > COMMENT:
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > I had trouble parsing "output it to or queue it for" (this occurs twice
>> > in the sentence).
>> >
>> >    However, it does not output it to or queue it for that link,
>> >    although, if appropriate (for example, the frame is multi-
>> >    destination), it may output it to or queue it for other links.
>>
>> It's kind of verbose but I believe that actual output port
>> implementations typically provide for directly streaming out a packet
>> even as other parts of the packet are still arriving at the switch,
>> particularly in cut-through routing, or just sticking it in a queue
>> for output later if the port is busy. Do you have any suggestion for
>> better wording?
>
>
> I was thinking that
>
>     However, it does not output it to, or queue it for, that link,
>     although, if appropriate (for example, the frame is multi-
>    destination), it may output it to, or queue it for, other links.
>
> might be clearer.
>
> If the RFC Editor removes the commas, of course, you can slap me in
Chicago
> ;-)
>
> Spencer
>>
>>
>> > I don't think the text is incorrect, just awkward. Perhaps commas would
>> > help?
>> >
>> > In these three subsection titles,
>> >
>> >    3.2.1 Change Optimization One
>> >
>> >    3.2.2 Change Optimization Two
>> >
>> >    3.2.3 Settling Detection Optimization
>> >
>> > I found the title for 3.2.3 helpful, but not 3.2.1 or 3.2.2. Is it
>> > possible to come up with more descriptive titles?
>>
>> That's a reasonable point. Maybe
>>
>>    3.2.1 Optimization for Change to Lower Priority
>>
>>    3.2.2 Optimization for Change to Priority Only
>>
>>
>> > I found
>> >
>> >    For robustness, a TRILL switch sends a number of copies of a Port-
>> >    Shutdown messages configurable from one to three, which defaults to
>> >    two copies, at a configurable interval, which defaults to 20
>> >    milliseconds (see Section 6.6).
>> >
>> > difficult to parse. Perhaps
>> >
>> >    For robustness, a TRILL switch sends a configurable number of copies
>> >    of Port-Shutdown messages separated by a configurable interval. The
>> > default
>> >    number of copies is two, although this can be configured as one copy
>> >    or as three copies, and the default interval is 20 milliseconds
>> >    (see Section 6.6).
>> >
>> > ?
>>
>> Sure, that seems like an improvement. Might also be good to say "time
>> interval" instead of just "interval".
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Donald
>> ===============================
>>  Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
>>  155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
>>  d3e3e3@gmail.com
>
>