Re: [trill] [RTG-DIR] Routing directorate QA review of draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-multilevel

[Alia Atlas <[e-mail]>]

Stig,

Thank you very much for your review.  I'm also forwarding it to trill so
that the WG can see it.

Regards,
Alia

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Stig Venaas <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Sorry for being a bit late with this review. At least the document is
> well written and easy to understand. There are no significant issues.
>
> I am wondering about the security considerations though. Are there
> really no differences between the multi-level alternatives when it
> comes to security?
>
> I have two tiny editorial comments.
>
> Section 1.4 typo
> RBridge - Routing Bridge, an alterntive name for a TRILL switch
>                                                ^^^^^^^^^
>
> Also, several places it says "non-zero" which is correct, but there
> are some instances of "nonzero".
>
> Stig
>
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Jonathan Hardwick
> <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > Hi Stig
> >
> >
> >
> > Please would you do a routing directorate QA review of
> > draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-multilevel?
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-multilevel/
> >
> >
> >
> > Note that this is a “QA review.” The document is still being worked on by
> > the TRILL working group.  The goal of this review is to provide a
> different
> > perspective on the work and to improve its quality. Hence, your comments
> > will be provided primarily for the benefit of the TRILL chairs and the
> > document authors.
> >
> >
> >
> > Please could you provide your comments by May 20 and copy your comments
> to
> > the rtg-dir list?
> >
> >
> >
> > The following web page contains a briefing on the QA process, and
> guidance
> > for the QA reviewer.
> >
> > https://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDirDocQa
> >
> >
> >
> > Please let me know whether you can do it, or not.
> >
> >
> >
> > Many thanks
> >
> > Jon
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>