Re: [trill] draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-05 - 2 week WG LC (5/29 to 6/12)

Mingui Zhang <zhangmingui@huawei.com> Mon, 01 June 2015 01:53 UTC

Return-Path: <zhangmingui@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80111B137B for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 May 2015 18:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WhC7zne5JAW2 for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 May 2015 18:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F260E1B29A4 for <trill@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 May 2015 18:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BWS46454; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 01:52:53 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.37) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 02:52:52 +0100
Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.152]) by nkgeml406-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.37]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 09:52:45 +0800
From: Mingui Zhang <zhangmingui@huawei.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "trill@ietf.org" <trill@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [trill] draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-05 - 2 week WG LC (5/29 to 6/12)
Thread-Index: AdCaCmcpq5lgvSoHTv2mkuf69u8KsQCAli6A
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 01:52:44 +0000
Message-ID: <4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E76ABE10B5@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <02e201d09a0c$47249810$d56dc830$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <02e201d09a0c$47249810$d56dc830$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.102.74]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E76ABE10B5nkgeml512mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/82TOsCUAD2NAGRO5HVfzDpnzXdM>
Cc: 'Donald Eastlake' <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, "trill-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <trill-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel@tools.ietf.org>, 'Jon Hudson' <jon.hudson@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [trill] draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-05 - 2 week WG LC (5/29 to 6/12)
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill/>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 01:53:08 -0000

I read the draft before and see the changes in this version. The two enhancement (payload type and security) to the RBridge Channel is useful. Example Payload listed in Section 3 are typical.  Support for WG LC.

Thanks,
Mingui

From: trill [mailto:trill-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 8:38 PM
To: trill@ietf.org
Cc: 'Donald Eastlake'; trill-chairs@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel@tools.ietf.org; shares@ndzh.com; 'Jon Hudson'
Subject: [trill] draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-05 - 2 week WG LC (5/29 to 6/12)

This is to begin a 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-05 (5/29 to 6/12).  The authors (Donald, Mohammed, Yizhou) should send a note to the list indicating whether they know if any IPR.

You can access the draft at:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel/

A summary of the document is:
   The IETF TRILL (Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links)
   protocol includes an optional mechanism, called RBridge Channel, that
   is specified in RFC 7178, for the transmission of typed messages
   between TRILL switches in the same campus and between TRILL switches
   and end stations on the same link. This document specifies two
   optional extensions to the RBridge Channel protocol: (1) A standard
   method to tunnel a variety of payload types by encapsulating them in
   an RBridge Channel message; and (2) A method to support security
   facilities for RBridge Channel messages. This document updates RFC
   7178.

Please answer the following questions:

1)      Does this draft enhance RFC7178 and is it ready for WG LC?

2)      Do you have any concerns regarding the mechanisms?


Sue