[trill] draft-ietf-trill-irb-07 document shepherd review

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Wed, 02 December 2015 02:39 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96FD1B3171 for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 18:39:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.35
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.35 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UwOFvk4wR9kZ for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 18:39:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x235.google.com (mail-ob0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 434621B3170 for <trill@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 18:39:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obbbj7 with SMTP id bj7so22073347obb.1 for <trill@ietf.org>; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 18:39:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=RJplFkxMYBMWqiicY9K1peQbaUJNFLHpMrLIRI7tm84=; b=wzqWIc08BuGtF1Wcn6r6nZ9l6tfMGY44dmf1UP8CZZJxFlArGIM1FLr3gstT3EmIPm C52KCG1a4jO6XlLY5AEwhL59hifLnwELqhoOrnZNRMR5rJz8SQ7jcj8k82f6NzsAryuS IU5Lg778kQoVEhh2G6F3TxdvR7XN1cdtmoX5t0QXR5ZNLmlIxT6DCBVn20vTXvMlkIHh XRj/WWNKaiav0vDUshmcQjsX/PeOEkR1dv4Xq3+B2kvWErzb5UhlPmviR8iWe51zkmCx 6FAdLMcScdT71E6npONmKVs7JRZnPrGGUWMhPm/pnfa+k28h6KchNw5f2dzThgie9TCc urWQ==
X-Received: by with SMTP id o11mr573142obr.68.1449023967615; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 18:39:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by with HTTP; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 18:39:13 -0800 (PST)
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 21:39:13 -0500
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEHYt2BfYmZ25tALXsfOVU42pGdxHdzv1rYOaX1iYvtoEw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "trill@ietf.org" <trill@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/AtSCu-gQyzGQYF2kve5yLZH7zh0>
Subject: [trill] draft-ietf-trill-irb-07 document shepherd review
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trill/>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 02:39:30 -0000


I did a pass over this draft to fix nits and polish the wording a bit.
My suggested changes, all pretty minor, are as follows:

Section 2: It would probably be good to add FGL to the list of acronyms.

Section 3.1, Section 6, and Section 6.1: I don't think the example IP
addresses used here would actually cause a problem, particularly the
use of addresses in 10/8. Nevertheless, we are supposed to use the IP
addresses specifically set aside for examples in publications.... I
suggest the following substitutions:
   "10.1.1" -> "192.0.2"
   "20.1.1" -> "198.51.100"
   "" -> "", "" -> ""
   "" -> "", "" -> ""
   "" -> "", "" -> ""
   "" -> "", "" -> ""

Section 3.2: Not very important but in the second line of items 1 and
2, there seems to be an odd triple space.

Section 5: I think "network operator should ensure" should be "network
operator MUST ensure".

Section 5.2: 4th paragraph, page 12, there is a reference to "a
reasonable amount of time". Could that be made just little more
specific by changing it to something like "a reasonable amount of
time, for example twice the IS-IS Holding Time generally in use in the
TRILL campus,"?

Section 5.3, 2nd paragraph, line 4: "through ARP/ND process" ->
"through the ARP/ND process". Also, towards the end of that paragraph,
"based on local load ballancing algorithm, then" -> "based on least
cost or, if costs are equal, the local load blanacing algorith. Then"

Section 5.4, 4th paragraph, page 14: two instances "path" -> "paths".

Section 7.1: first and second bullets, 2nd line of each: More odd triple spaces.

Section 7.2, at the end: "SHOULD not" -> "SHOULD NOT"

Section 7.3: first and second bullets, 2nd line of each: More odd triple spaces.
Section 7.4:: first bullet only, 2nd line: Another odd triple spaces.


   There is one reference in the document to "[RFC6425]" which should
be "[RFC6325]"

   [RFC7357] should be removed from the Normative References section
since it is not actually referenced anywhere in the document.

   Also, there is one line is this draft that is longer than 72
characters: in the Normative References section, the entry for
[RFC6325], for some reason the 2nd line is 73 characters long. The
final comma of that line is the 73rd character. Lines in Internet
drafts are not permitted to be more than 72 characters. The line needs
to be wrapped before 'Specifiction",'.

 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA