[trill] AD review of draft-ietf-trill-smart-endnodes-07

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Mon, 19 February 2018 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23C01205F0; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 08:04:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5CJTBx487BZP; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 08:04:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22b.google.com (mail-oi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52956124BAC; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 08:04:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id y4so7236133oix.2; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 08:04:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=GIsi95CDlS7ycVM7cWWjwc+qVzdjbGvxJTIr/HEUGys=; b=PixCsBJN4zoInkiwEMlB7IGN2uQup8wKgubYY3MZ32cIb/La0PhbPLArLe7WinF6La /DrdrUrdh6XptPJnLh4x7DSAnAr32VdCBStoN7oFmNtOt9zLNkBBb541GH7cLCs4+Ffi aB32tq6wPa570wlK2sCOFpEBNSAraAUdlPnGscebL7a1ND8PfNXduS6ox6GcZkwB3PyG p/DHmIX0FpfWesZxjIWD9zohDZiK0ZSH80zFpj5L6w2ZYuAp7/eoBFbR0Qh0LpJvEy8B 3gsg6AY6NIqvlBSbRmtZzLVcwddwa1MU2sQ3Wu0qg/nF2bwrN5SjcIWGPYNIxwGwQVq7 Bh9g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=GIsi95CDlS7ycVM7cWWjwc+qVzdjbGvxJTIr/HEUGys=; b=K6uSXWdOk7FnMmFy0SkIQ+UIFZBR72C+ncMHJcGFpNE9vrYU92Jhn2bCOiSpwKuO+D OfgLdN/StrHSxyNL1qFXsHp7dJAGU5URLO4yXjrBqDxj937M8hmn6Vr7UpU2fjHa/BmI MHlMCYV8uWHFZsvlKSq3LABf7kWJCCUoQ99H2XTC2KhKz4Otu77FfmDMnnCkhCbu8FtM rwxB+NKFtITSt5Ke7NIXKich3LA+YouHWGk8Wtw6n83AVj6qQdEqQDp+zhG7hJ1rRvMk 8tKOeJEzIfSDRGPfQmafg7Y9gTtG60J+romqWC5D+NwTNzDXGn1Y7oSXQ9a9SHaoIQor QWTA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPCancy/GN8raS2fRyg02+JsseLCtecB8G7i7VAx+++lufOasDkI i7ZCbE+lus86WclAOOrSFYu7djvUZmZPHBgYy+izzyx6
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227A8wxMHZSrItnM0p+6cfAMv3Ym3sdmIgiNSbw8CiVsc2lgVkOqdPhdBuE6V9v+7IkMcahtG9iRdZv+oWOfA/w=
X-Received: by 10.202.80.138 with SMTP id e132mr2967580oib.269.1519056247108; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 08:04:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.68.57 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 08:04:06 -0800 (PST)
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 11:04:06 -0500
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rcYo-xSAhXpwyw=kjwEFNY=sYNpe=xWJ7S-B3VNfmwzfA@mail.gmail.com>
To: trill@ietf.org, draft-ietf-trill-smart-endnodes@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113b05f800b834056592d8e5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/CJWotExASTi-IEfEP2IkxL2roNs>
Subject: [trill] AD review of draft-ietf-trill-smart-endnodes-07
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trill/>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 16:04:11 -0000

As is customary, I have done my AD review of
draft-ietf-trill-smart-endnodes-07.
First, I would like to thank the authors - Radia, Fangwei, Donald, Kesava,
and Ting - for
their work on this draft.

I have no substantive comments, though a few nits are below.

When I have received the shepherd's report, I will put this into IETF Last
Call and target it for the March 8 telechat.

Nits:

a) Sec 3: "The Smart Endnode solution proposed in this document " - should
be "defined" or such instead of "proposed".

b) Sec 3: "smart ennodes which can encapsulate" - "ennodes" should be
"endnodes"

c) Sec 3: "capbillity" should be capability

d) Sec 5.2: "endnod's"  shoould be "endnode's"

Regards,
Alia