[trill] trill WG closing at IETF 101
Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Fri, 16 February 2018 00:32 UTC
Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 572DA12426E
for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:32:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id AQYDn-J_Ko-R for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:32:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot0-x229.google.com (mail-ot0-x229.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::229])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C961D124235
for <trill@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:32:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot0-x229.google.com with SMTP id w10so1390176ote.13
for <trill@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:32:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=IjvroEDmuj8HM4RWrQgW3PRhcl2E8TNheFJ4LjT0Zwc=;
b=mCBMKMjAubWalwNgF3o0EJSCCDI9+FQsXK9hzyEDzZv5zptIxa/5mIJOUilUSHOWvL
KNxEnLLBlK1jXTiidrrForycKn/s4CZ973MpBfeJpieSzXvoz+NyaIyr0In32yADC/3Z
SAQ+x72Tr8E91a/NXgAfg5L/nXpIBKuMVq+KEJcHBiSCZgLv1JDtv1W+nQ7IKLGn//p2
nSgtReljEJB2UJszqw976Uh6IbWwVi4VHdlt/KitvPsp8ySDYZRSTeyhhu+3HFTvWsz2
rb/yJLvldi/0ya5qGgV/73tlLm5Ogne1BTN5qT4LI+agqJ37s6jlnNzOcdRMUv4gvtgv
930w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=IjvroEDmuj8HM4RWrQgW3PRhcl2E8TNheFJ4LjT0Zwc=;
b=CIsyVUNeMnBVV9tfOhqRwWIFGpGwekLL/vCbIveTFwO2s182otk3aSFumqnAui5XF5
Ye4ItUu1FxBUrxvW0YP2/PEZzluHrhsvmvYqvYvftX6i9g3T4A9bE0bd7KiEAVNDBCBC
YgpjavnpiizgG0v48Qzwt/1Jb986ARf7IpkaOxydsc1mH3kyalq8u9JuBC/dceGCWax7
SSVRB9RFqN3MqtOzbgMwcIQaH6dPUCFw1pNw0nRmNF1lB/nkw2eQvVQ9ADnSCNfm3s4l
zzkGjFq9kMRRkgWRddKzgYJ2E9HmWkXM7PqZdeBiLNPsygJrCTqHwPJDDiV6cqdR0Ddo
9Enw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPAiQwvV9UWHpnYZaNveB05IsViTLgCoPMTO8+l6g4/r/go2qB5N
KK8QI9tJcjAYB2DQzi2dgDJp0O2w1Bc/sVs8Po80sQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225e2mw+pMohwvh6MfMzuubRZ24TFveaET8br66V4NV3ePMTdZL2aNRRgxtzM1yp6VjNB0wFfX76aHWyJUyD3Q0=
X-Received: by 10.157.44.201 with SMTP id e9mr3180444otd.6.1518741160879; Thu,
15 Feb 2018 16:32:40 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.64.244 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:32:40 -0800 (PST)
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:32:40 -0500
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rd_b9pprtaA2Y-QwFLryCDQN73eypuSD_QNKsFYr+kC4g@mail.gmail.com>
To: trill@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ad9f8666b0b0565497b2b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/DMy2yG0_qZ8CepprstusEipKuhw>
Subject: [trill] trill WG closing at IETF 101
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>,
<mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trill/>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>,
<mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:32:43 -0000
I would like to remind the TRILL working group that I will be closing it at IETF 101. We discussed this at IETF 99 and IETF 100. I have told the WG that important work would need to move fast. If you are the author of a WG draft, then it will require excellent response times to get your WG draft done. There are currently 8 drafts in WGLC. Any that are not in IETF Last Call - including my AD review by next Tues are highly unlikely to make the March 8 telechat, which is my final telechat. I can only read so fast - and if the draft wasn't top of stack for over six months, then I have to question its criticality to be published. You will start seeing AD reviews from me on drafts; please respond and deal ASAP. Regards, Alia
- [trill] trill WG closing at IETF 101 Alia Atlas