Re: [trill] Questions to TRILL Smart Endnodes draft

Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com> Fri, 11 January 2013 20:21 UTC

Return-Path: <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55BD721F8A93 for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:21:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kXhKHzA5O9on for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:21:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225A021F89FD for <trill@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:21:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AOQ87584; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 20:21:26 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 20:20:19 +0000
Received: from DFWEML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.134) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 20:21:23 +0000
Received: from DFWEML505-MBX.china.huawei.com ([10.124.31.100]) by dfweml408-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.134]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:21:19 -0800
From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
To: Radia Perlman <radiaperlman@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [trill] Questions to TRILL Smart Endnodes draft
Thread-Index: AQHN7rkrS7AADs7TvEa0mW1AYaXweZhEk6ZQ
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 20:21:19 +0000
Message-ID: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F6450E0B9A@dfweml505-mbx>
References: <D5A6F3355F664C40AFB65BB1277D8D450186C7F7AD@MAAX7MCDC101.APAC.DELL.COM> <6895EAE0CA8DEE40B92D7CA88BB521F32414007827@HQ1-EXCH02.corp.brocade.com> <CAFOuuo7t8xt8Z1mx78G2SsE8tkmAMNs44xd11Mc43S1_WfH6RA@mail.gmail.com> <6895EAE0CA8DEE40B92D7CA88BB521F32414007BC1@HQ1-EXCH02.corp.brocade.com> <CAFOuuo626hw-c0kM4-1Fp-w2gByPenRnkFP3xNT+cTB4YcJ2kg@mail.gmail.com> <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F6450E01E4@dfweml505-mbx> <CAFOuuo6=wDeKiG-zjSnkcO3B2iTbazpsGHNYJLSfOxYZsh9kFA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFOuuo6=wDeKiG-zjSnkcO3B2iTbazpsGHNYJLSfOxYZsh9kFA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.192.11.236]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F6450E0B9Adfweml505mbx_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: "d3e3e3@gmail.com" <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, "Kesava_Vijaya_Krupak@Dell.com" <Kesava_Vijaya_Krupak@dell.com>, "hu.fangwei@zte.com.cn" <hu.fangwei@zte.com.cn>, "trill@ietf.org" <trill@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [trill] Questions to TRILL Smart Endnodes draft
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 20:21:36 -0000

Radia,

Questions inserted below:

From: Radia Perlman [mailto:radiaperlman@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 4:32 PM
To: Linda Dunbar
Cc: Phanidhar Koganti; d3e3e3@gmail.com; Kesava_Vijaya_Krupak@Dell.com; hu.fangwei@zte.com.cn; trill@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [trill] Questions to TRILL Smart Endnodes draft


If there is a smart endnode on a shared link with other endnodes, it learns about its endnode neighbors, and sends directly to them (without encapsulation).  If smart E wants to talk to unknown destination D, E has to send two copies; one (without encapsulation), multicast on the link, and the other (with encapsulation), forwarded to the attached RBridge R.
[Linda] Agree

R has been warned by E of all the MAC addresses E owns.  R must drop all packets it receives on the link if either the source or destination MAC is one of the ones owned by a smart endnode on the link.

[Linda] What if multiple "smart endnode" sharing one link? For example, there could be a bridge aggregating traffic from multiple end nodes (smart and regular), or the multiple smart nodes as VMs sharing a physical server?

Linda