[trill] WG LC on draft-ietf-p2mp-bfd-04.txt - 2/7/2016 to 2/21/2016 - Second WG LC (3/7 to 3/20)
Santosh P K <santosh.pallagatti@gmail.com> Tue, 25 April 2017 07:53 UTC
Return-Path: <santosh.pallagatti@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693B21318E2 for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3rTVF5k5FGvZ for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x229.google.com (mail-it0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 441D5128B8E for <trill@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x229.google.com with SMTP id f187so9086271ite.1 for <trill@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=mPLB7dleaVjH8M+KtTSD/Ol2BplGSuANV+OnuPBzceE=; b=GExdGMlgCnqo32yQdVX9WbipSP4lS/WVVcWiedG19mHU4HTiQfWY7ZBCu6Chh/KwWA Dt0dH85O85Btf2gquG3O/d4ZJQcU9TRcKwmfZhkNtHs7pEsAOWedmsTfvhZ5vT/gcKw9 EhFE/yHfF7GCeBR2TRsULh9aPNdnyNZsf4Na/Iv9nLNLl78rO51vyBgBzO2N/yfKS/WN eO3sTeUB0pqK6HGM3HYS4yDkKtyYaMtQ8keFfwVFe2D+gWJOppS5Thkwmo62nVEQIVsO GNoU//IqOw6HddU55XmG4++VYreubENiuGP1LJx5UEJNmqUqGLcux3m1pyVVCD52+mQc /OsQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=mPLB7dleaVjH8M+KtTSD/Ol2BplGSuANV+OnuPBzceE=; b=r9YRY/HzuTno9PHqEv4dCXYHIkatSGzhYQm4MUOWtd6jSdh7eZKlIaqIzQ1HO+W+yy hBba1yTHTvYunS7rTPLrmdTKDhD8HiDc70AYmDw9Cw0eABqK+GaDIrONYeY6nodKmGlu BhkXO7iOuB3Exsn0SOVfrVPe1T5Esty9JbKeppFnVnKAx2x8jgBha/xMSp71/vQBqwLS ScHho9625HB/f/ZGY98qbC91RvwWOHUaoumlmv54d+1FOy+Pu8Ov0ydSQHWLRt54zYZw uSKwNVzob87Cm5MG0QWLQZMCWLGSPuirERgpUISuO31TaxYrM3AqrH2xyT3Rj4MdgCD5 0FOA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7/4owtTsooLgaorKBoC09561EUuHQYALOBkENBUFmxy4jSp80E k7++oO175nhEUS920wdQvOhcdgSEKmKS
X-Received: by 10.36.103.86 with SMTP id u83mr2582923itc.91.1493106826475; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.29.3 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Santosh P K <santosh.pallagatti@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 13:23:46 +0530
Message-ID: <CACi9rdvGppDjJBddifBXokNKa0ov_8Mf2KFUBcuAZw8HGyvdag@mail.gmail.com>
To: trill@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114ab4ea010061054df906a8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/K4SXdvSdzAjot6L92I2skG25_LY>
Subject: [trill] WG LC on draft-ietf-p2mp-bfd-04.txt - 2/7/2016 to 2/21/2016 - Second WG LC (3/7 to 3/20)
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trill/>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 07:53:49 -0000
>We did not receive any comments on the WGLC for draft->ietf-p2mp-bfd-04.txt >(https://www.ietf.org/mail->archive/web/trill/current/msg07692.html <https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill/current/msg07692.html>). >Perhaps this was because I started the WG LC during >Chinese new year. We >will try a second WG LC before declaring "no support for >this draft" >In your comments please consider, >1) Does the support of multi-point BFD aid >deployments? >2) Are the suggested additions to RFC7177 >bootstrapping sufficient for >this technology? >3) Do you feel this technology is ready for >standardization? I do support this draft and think it is good for standardisation. Thanks Santosh P K