[trill] FW: re: [RTG-DIR] Routing Directorate QA Review of draft-ietf-trill-smart-endnodes-02
"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Mon, 22 January 2018 16:51 UTC
Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA0CF1273B1; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:51:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.946
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VTPHrymekV07; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:51:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74108124207; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:51:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=166.176.249.181;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: trill@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-trill-smart-endnodes@ietf.org, hu.fangwei@zte.com.cn, radiaperlman@gmail.com, d3e3e3@gmail.com, Kesava_Vijaya_Krupak@Dell.com, liaoting82@163.com, 'Alia Atlas' <akatlas@gmail.com>
References:
In-Reply-To:
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:50:57 -0500
Message-ID: <014801d393a1$2d6b97c0$8842c740$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0149_01D39377.4497D9B0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQI5YhTR3Mf8sL72ZkmCHgJsqTpOiqK0fWGA
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/L-kDj-BEIFqhDTFqyLNL668IINM>
Subject: [trill] FW: re: [RTG-DIR] Routing Directorate QA Review of draft-ietf-trill-smart-endnodes-02
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trill/>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:51:02 -0000
This message was sent to the RTG-DIR email list this morning. I have copied this email to the TRILL WG so that the Smart Endnode authors can watch the RTG-DIR email list in case Julien answers there. In addition, we may receive responses on this draft from the security ADs or the security area directorate. Cheerily, Sue Hares From: Susan Hares [mailto:shares@ndzh.com] Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 11:45 AM To: 'rtg-dir@ietf.org'; 'Julien Meuric' Cc: 'akatlas@juniper.net'; 'Donald Eastlake'; 'trill-chairs@ietf.org'; 'BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A'; 'Alvaro Retana' Subject: re: [RTG-DIR] Routing Directorate QA Review of draft-ietf-trill-smart-endnodes-02 Julien: The TRILL WG appreciates you doing a review of draft-ietf-trill-smart-endnodes-02. However, the authors indicate you have not reviewed the changes. We are now at draft-ietf-trill-smart-endnodes-06.txt. As the shepherd, you mentioned in July that you did not see that -05 fixed the problems. Would you take a look at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-smart-endnodes/ Here's your major comments: _Main Issue_ What is now inconsistent is the use of IS-IS TLVs and sub-TLVs, probably because the former version seemed more IS-IS based. [Sue analysis of -06.txt ]: The SMART-Parameters APPsub-TLV is within the TRILL GENINFO TLV. Therefore, the it updates the TRILL APPSUB-TLV types - a portion of the registry under TRILL standardization control. TRILL utilizes IS-IS packets including Hellos and IS-IS cryptographic mechanisms. I believe the two code points requested in this document resolve the your related problems #1-4. Please review the associated TRILL documents and ISIS documents to determine if you feel the problem is resolved. If you do not feel it is resolved, will you let me know quickly. Due to our attempt to close TRILL within 2 months, I must ask for a quick response on this review. (version 6) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-smart-endnodes/ Your review: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-dir/current/msg02740.html Thank you for all your aid, Susan Hares