IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [trill] WG LC for draft-ietf-trill-multilevel-single-nickname-05.txt (1/26/2018 to 2/9/2018)

"Zhuangyan (Yan)" <zhuangyan.zhuang@huawei.com> Wed, 14 February 2018 05:40 UTC

Return-Path: <zhuangyan.zhuang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83AF120227 for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 21:40:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b4pcFiUgkZgL for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 21:40:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6CE21200B9 for <trill@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 21:40:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 1E5E2A901D8BB for <trill@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 05:40:28 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.75) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 05:40:29 +0000
Received: from NKGEML513-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.231]) by nkgeml414-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 13:40:23 +0800
From: "Zhuangyan (Yan)" <zhuangyan.zhuang@huawei.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "trill@ietf.org" <trill@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Re: [trill] WG LC for draft-ietf-trill-multilevel-single-nickname-05.txt (1/26/2018 to 2/9/2018)
Thread-Index: AdOlVg+q4Fi9goy0QbGSkOEdfzzIfw==
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 05:40:23 +0000
Message-ID: <9B4BC45FDEDDD84F813E9E4A5BAF8785A969C9F7@nkgeml513-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.135.170.230]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9B4BC45FDEDDD84F813E9E4A5BAF8785A969C9F7nkgeml513mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/Lx07Mu5aOu3otAIVqTEbNpabG_o>
Subject: Re: [trill] WG LC for draft-ietf-trill-multilevel-single-nickname-05.txt (1/26/2018 to 2/9/2018)
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trill/>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 05:40:34 -0000

Support this work and it is ready for publication.

Best Regards,

Yan

-----Original Message-----
From: trill [mailto:trill-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 22:12:26 -0500
To: trill at ietf.org
Cc: "'Donald Eastlake'" <d3e3e3 at gmail.com>, trill-chairs at ietf.org, "'Alia Atlas'" <akatlas at gmail.com>
Subject: WG LC for draft-ietf-trill-multilevel-single-nickname-05.txt (1/26/2018 to 2/9/2018)
This begins a 2 week WG LC  on draft-ietf-trill-multilevel-single-nickname which you can access at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-multilevel-single-nickname/

Please consider the following questions:

1)       Does this draft help us build multilevel TRILL and manage RBridge nicknames in multilevel TRILL?

2)      Will this solution help in deployments?

3)      Is this document ready for publication?

Thank you for your review.

This weekend you will see several other WG LCs as this is the final week for WG Last Calls for the TRILL WG.   Please review drafts and be prompt in your response.  We cannot extend the time period for these WG LCs.

Cheerily, Susan Hares

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email