[trill] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-trill-arp-optimization-06: (with COMMENT)

"Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 06 July 2016 15:38 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160706153805.26732.6372.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 08:38:05 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/PwJDQNPbW087BOoY7vJon9cSnvI>
Cc: draft-ietf-trill-arp-optimization@ietf.org, trill-chairs@ietf.org, trill@ietf.org, skh@ndzh.com
Subject: [trill] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-trill-arp-optimization-06: (with COMMENT)

Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-trill-arp-optimization-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-arp-optimization/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------


3.2, 2nd last para: don't you need to say to never fake
SEND responses? saying "prevent local reply" seems unclear
to me, and a MUST NOT would seem called for.  I guess
Suresh's discuss covers that though, so just to note I agree
with him on that.

[trill] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-i… Stephen Farrell