Re: [trill] TRILL OAM Framework

"Samer Salam (ssalam)" <ssalam@cisco.com> Tue, 03 July 2012 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ssalam@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35FF011E8176 for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 10:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I3o7nPzHCcNT for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 10:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523E711E80A4 for <trill@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 10:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=ssalam@cisco.com; l=4297; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1341336243; x=1342545843; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=p85yvCwvgxlubQgQeg7P/AHqxeJFZmGDwXaaYqq1cjA=; b=gHlRZPN14yfm01Eobzeq8011drtzQ9qZKIA48xvwZ+R0BexpdH7L4V0h FoobUl1mW+AJy736aeFAffNtwkYRy3VM9WSU/OoJQU4AtszrzBKPrLDT7 blPuIiKe3m1FGCWPyUIaaP0VD24TglSZCrL9r4WQ2Ppyo2N9ZhQ062zJE o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EANwp80+tJV2d/2dsb2JhbABEtweBB4IYAQEBBAEBAQ8BJy0HBAcMBgEIEQQBAR8JLgsUCQgCBAENBSKHaQEKmgugSos3hhoDlTWBEo0LgWaCXw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,516,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="98465451"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Jul 2012 17:24:02 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com [173.37.183.89]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q63HO2FL007504 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 3 Jul 2012 17:24:02 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x13.cisco.com ([fe80::5404:b599:9f57:834b]) by xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([173.37.183.89]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 12:24:02 -0500
From: "Samer Salam (ssalam)" <ssalam@cisco.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, "Tissa Senevirathne (tsenevir)" <tsenevir@cisco.com>, "trill@ietf.org" <trill@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [trill] TRILL OAM Framework
Thread-Index: AQHNWLU4Y56Vxpdf4UaUM/9CKstBU5cXVutQgABQLECAAAcAYIAAADwA
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 17:24:01 +0000
Message-ID: <CC1876B9.79C5%ssalam@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0407C4C7CB@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.2.120421
x-originating-ip: [161.44.210.181]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19014.005
x-tm-as-result: No--53.245600-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <9C1B4CBEF160894D9F3465DA6438AA4A@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Sam Aldrin <sam.aldrin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [trill] TRILL OAM Framework
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 17:23:56 -0000

Hi Dan,

Thanks for your comments. We will incorporate in the next revision.

Regarding FCAPS, will clarify that these are Management Functional Areas
(MFAs) per ITU-T M3010, X.700 and X.701.

Regards,
Samer



On 12-07-03 8:30 AM, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote:

>Hi Tissa,
>
>See in-line. 
>
>Regards,
>
>Dan
>
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tissa Senevirathne (tsenevir) [mailto:tsenevir@cisco.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 6:20 PM
>> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Samer Salam (ssalam); trill@ietf.org
>> Cc: Sam Aldrin
>> Subject: RE: [trill] TRILL OAM Framework
>> 
>> Dan
>> 
>> Thanks for the comments please see in-line.
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 3:26 AM
>> To: Samer Salam (ssalam); trill@ietf.org
>> Cc: Tissa Senevirathne (tsenevir); Sam Aldrin
>> Subject: RE: [trill] TRILL OAM Framework
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I have two basic comments to start:
>> 
>> - The use of the OAM acronym conflicts with the recommendations in RFC
>> 6291 / BCP 161 which recommends the OAM expansion in the IETF
>documents
>> to be Operations, Administration, and Maintenance
>> 
>> [Answer] According to RFC 6291, Operations (O of OAM) refers to
>> activities related to  keep network up and running. Those includes
>> finding problems before users are affected. These are the faults and
>> performance issues.  It is  very similar to RFC 6371, where it says
>"...
>> OAM  procedures that fulfill the MPLS-TP OAM requirements for fault,
>> performance, and Protection-switching management ... ". So to our best
>> of knowledge we believe it is in line with 6291 and follow the other
>> established RFC such as RFC 6371. However,  appreciate if you could
>> specifically point out the conflicts and we are more than happy to
>> correct/update/stream-line.  Are you referring to the same usage case
>> below ?
>
>
>[[DR]] According to RFC 6291 M is for Maintenance.
>
>> 
>> - 'OAM, in general, covers multiple areas, including: ...' - and then
>> FCAPS are listed. This is wrong. These are actually not 'aspects of
>OAM'
>> but the five functional areas in the OSI model for Network Management
>> defined in the 80s (ISO/IEC 7498-4).
>> 
>> [Answer] If the reference is to what is listed towards end of the
>> Introduction then we can fix the usage .
>> 
>[[DR]] It's wrong IMO to claim that FCAPS is about OAM. FCAPS is about
>Network Management. It does not cover accounting, and seldom carries
>security information for example. The paragraph about 'multiple areas'
>should be taken out completely. You do not need it, just say that you
>focus on carrying faults and performance functionality.
>
>
>
>
>> Reference Text cut and pasted below from Introduction..
>> 
>>    OAM, in general, covers multiple areas, including:
>>    - Fault Management
>>    - Performance Management
>>    - Configuration
>>    - Accounting
>>    - Security
>> 
>> 
>> I do not know if this confusion between OAM and network management is
>> intentional or not, but it's a confusion. OAM and Network Management
>are
>> different things, there are areas of interaction and relations between
>> the two, but they need to be kept distinct and such confusions need to
>> be avoided.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Dan
>> 
>> 
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: trill-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:trill-bounces@ietf.org] On
>Behalf
>> > Of Samer Salam (ssalam)
>> > Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 3:46 AM
>> > To: trill@ietf.org
>> > Cc: Tissa Senevirathne (tsenevir); Sam Aldrin
>> > Subject: [trill] TRILL OAM Framework
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> > We have published
>> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-salam-trill-oam-framework
>which
>> > describes a proposed reference framework for TRILL OAM. The
>framework
>> > leverages concepts widely adopted in 802.1ag, RFC6136, RFC6371,
>etc...
>> >
>> > We invite and welcome your feedback on the initial draft.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Samer
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > trill mailing list
>> > trill@ietf.org
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill