Re: [trill] 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-trill-ribridge-multilevel-00.txt. (11/24 to 12/8/2015)

["Susan Hares" <[e-mail]>]

The draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-multilevel-00.txt has passed WG LC.  

 

The TRILL chairs appreciate each person who sent in comments on this WG LC.  Since people indicated they would be traveling during this December, we extended this WG LC to allow more time for people to comment on this WG LC. 

 

Sue and Jon 

 

From: trill [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 3:36 PM
To: Mohammed Umair; Susan Hares; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Cc: Donald Eastlake; Jon Hudson; Alia Atlas
Subject: Re: [trill] 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-trill-ribridge-multilevel-00.txt. (11/24 to 12/8/2015)

 

Support, 

 

Linda

 

From: trill [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 3:46 PM
To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Cc: 'Donald Eastlake'; 'Jon Hudson'; 'Alia Atlas'
Subject: [trill] 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-trill-ribridge-multilevel-00.txt. (11/24 to 12/8/2015)

 

TRILL WG: 

 

This begins a 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-multilevel-00.txt.   This draft is going for informational RFC to explain the two technical approaches for extending TRILL protocol to be multi-level.  

 

Please note that this draft has 2 IPR: 

 

http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1813/

 

http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1579/

 

Each author of this draft should respond on the list if they know of additional IPR.  

 

The IESG has recently asked WGs to consider the value of information documents now and in 5 years.  Therefore, in your comments regarding WG LC, please consider: 

a)      Is the draft technically ready for WG last call? 

b)      Will this architectural type draft be useful to you as you explain these two options of multi-level TRILL? 

c)       Will this architectural document be critical in 5 years for TRILL deployments? 

 

Thank you,

Sue Hares and Jon Hudson 

 

 


.