IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [trill] Queries on ESADI LSP process

somnath chatterjee <somnath.chatterjee01@gmail.com> Wed, 15 August 2012 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <somnath.chatterjee01@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B6521F87ED for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 08:55:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_47=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_73=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id koJ16Tl8avmM for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 08:55:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571A721F87CA for <trill@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 08:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbwc20 with SMTP id wc20so2659311obb.31 for <trill@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 08:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=w5BsIHK08MKhiybCl4eLXSk1vu0z0IlCdAztejrYAAk=; b=Fw45SfJMt4COLM5nCjuhQ0fVm1DWSeCv28ZNTZmNxIO0w6tHGE3xlV+Fn+KvFo+b3V rUDeoa/4+AY7xuvxNze1EcaQNf6BfP7TsOQKTZ4WOVvJXVB4Th+44HZ5Miavr5zCfBK/ xgJ78uYCrZc6wto//oxdbqnxfR4UW1VJeiYvR0flOLy/lgk2sjblhDZRmIP2glzlWOdw KmGdvbSGPI8WIAKDfLj01kMgOH9NesjtKo6yk80FGBN1NwSqADpNEx9yllGPqE6XwBJK /OkEjImOFnnnBMqTkpItPMedMIPB9Q5DtmPyDl5kXBUZBMQiims1wczJIt8gD2sSpoTz suQA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.170.138 with SMTP id am10mr2302364oec.115.1345046142796; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 08:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.83.229 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 08:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHD03N-Z4cB_UHrbzr31HZgq+vSCcR0Gyk1RhL=N=m4hrEJb9g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPFewY1n5kFBnQq5bjE8h0sV_U1s6PN7hakRNFxCwaOPad9oBA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHD03N-Z4cB_UHrbzr31HZgq+vSCcR0Gyk1RhL=N=m4hrEJb9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 21:25:42 +0530
Message-ID: <CAPFewY01rWxb7Mj+7A-WxmWLVABj2CPDoF3N1Xknp5UDLamkXA@mail.gmail.com>
From: somnath chatterjee <somnath.chatterjee01@gmail.com>
To: Ayan Banerjee <ayabaner@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: trill@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [trill] Queries on ESADI LSP process
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:55:46 -0000

Hi Ayan,

Thank you for the valuable information.

Regards,
Somnath

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Ayan Banerjee <ayabaner@gmail.com> wrote:
> Somnath,
>
> This is no different than processing "routing" information for L3.
>
> Also, you should probably take a look at this:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isis-wg/current/msg03006.html
>
> Thanks,
> Ayan
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:07 AM, somnath chatterjee
> <somnath.chatterjee01@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Authors,
>>
>> Please consider this scenario when an ESADI RB1 has already 3
>> fragments of ESADI LSP from
>> ESADI RB2. And now it receives from RB2 an updated ESADI LSP-zero with
>> few changes(few MACs added
>> and few deleted) in MAC reachability TLV. How much time should the RB1
>> wait for other fragments
>> ESADI-LSP-1 ESADI_LSP-2 etc to come?
>> Also when all the fragmented ESADI LSPs have come, the comparison
>> between MAC  information in previously
>> received LSPs and new received LSPs will be easy if the MACs that are
>> lost are notified in some
>> way.Based on this comparisons the routes will be updated in hardware
>> (Egress Nickname, vlan, MAC1,MAC2).
>>
>> Is it possible to set any field to mark the last ESADI LSP fragment
>> send? This will help the receiving RB
>> to know when to start comparing the LSPs for noticing any change in
>> MAC association. Also is it possible to send
>> the MACs that were lost(marking them by some flag), the comparison
>> algorithm will be quicker if that is done.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Regards,
>> Somnath
>> _______________________________________________
>> trill mailing list
>> trill@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email