Re: [trill] 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-trill-ribridge-multilevel-00.txt. (11/24 to 12/8/2015)

honjun.zhai <> Tue, 16 August 2016 03:09 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655CE12D61F for <>; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 20:09:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.546
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.546 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_XBL=0.375, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XzMXd8qKAX3s for <>; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 20:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with SMTP id 63F0312D5F0 for <>; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 20:09:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown []) by bjzjm-tm-app6.localdomain (SMTP) with ESMTP id BBDF271EFF2 for <>; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:09:52 +0800 (CST)
Authentication-Results: bjzjm-antispam1; auth=pass (LOGIN)
Received: from [] ([] helo=bjzjm-tm-web6) by bjzjm-antispam1 (envelope-from <>) (ecelerity r(Platform: with ESMTPA id B4/FD-15209-FF382B75; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:09:51 +0800
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:09:52 +0800 (CST)
From: =?UTF-8?B?aG9uanVuLnpoYWk=?= <>
To: =?UTF-8?B?TWluZ3VpIFpoYW5n?= <>
Message-ID: <460131962.62464.1471316992377.JavaMail.root@bjzjm-tm-web6>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <051901d126a1$1dd20bb0$59762310$> <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_62462_519389129.1471316992375"
X-Mailer: TOMWEBMAIL 2.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/51.0.2704.106 Safari/537.36
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [trill] =?utf-8?q?2_week_WG_LC_on_draft-ietf-trill-ribridge-multi?= =?utf-8?q?level-00=2Etxt=2E_=2811/24_to_12/8/2015=29?=
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 03:09:59 -0000

<p><br /></p><p>I think it is ready for WG LC.</p><p><br /></p><p>I am unware of additional IPRs that need to be disclosed.</p><p><br /></p><p>Sorry for my so delayed response.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Hongjun Zhai</p><p>------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p>Jiangning&nbsp;District, Nanjing City, People's Republic of China</p><p>Mobile: +086-025-5287-7345</p><p>Email: <a href=""></a></p><p>------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p><br /></p><hr /><p><br /><br />于  2015-11-25 09:47:34,Mingui Zhang&lt;;写道:</p><blockquote style="padding-left:1ex;margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:#ccc 1px solid"><div class="WordSection1"><p><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">I think the draft is technically ready for WG LC. It is informative.</span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:#1F497D">I heard at least one option depicted in the doc is being deployed. Each of the two option has its own characteristics. It would be helpful and even necessary to provide both of them to various operators.</span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:#1F497D">There is no additional IPR that need to be disclosed according to my knowledge.</span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:#1F497D">Thanks,</span></p><p><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:#1F497D">Mingui</span></p><div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt"><div><div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm"><p><strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif">From:</span></strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif"> Susan Hares []<br /><strong>Sent:</strong> Tuesday, November 24, 2015 6:16 PM<br /><strong>To:</strong>;<br /><strong>Cc:</strong> 'Alia Atlas'; 'Donald Eastlake'; 'Jon Hudson'<br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-trill-ribridge-multilevel-00.txt. (11/24 to 12/8/2015)</span></p></div></div><p></p><p><span>TRILL WG: </span></p><p></p><p><span>This begins a 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-multilevel-00.txt.&nbsp;&nbsp; This draft is going for informational RFC to explain the two technical approaches for extending TRILL protocol to be multi-level.&nbsp;</span></p><p></p><p><span>Please note that this draft has 2 IPR: </span></p><p></p><p><span><a href=""></a></span></p><p></p><p><span><a href=""></a></span></p><p></p><p><span>Each author of this draft should respond on the list if they know of additional IPR.&nbsp;</span></p><p></p><p><span>The IESG has recently asked WGs to consider the value of information documents now and in 5 years.&nbsp; Therefore, in your comments regarding WG LC, please consider:</span></p><p style="text-indent:-18.0pt;"><span><span>a)<span style="font:7.0pt Times New Roman">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></span></span><span>Is the draft technically ready for WG last call?</span></p><p style="text-indent:-18.0pt;"><span><span>b)<span style="font:7.0pt Times New Roman">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></span></span><span>Will this architectural type draft be useful to you as you explain these two options of multi-level TRILL?</span></p><p style="text-indent:-18.0pt;"><span><span>c)<span style="font:7.0pt Times New Roman">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></span></span><span>Will this architectural document be critical in 5 years for TRILL deployments?</span></p><p></p><p><span>Thank you,</span></p><p><span>Sue Hares and Jon Hudson </span></p><p></p><p></p></div></div><pre>_______________________________________________
trill mailing list