IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [trill] review of Trill over UDP/IP

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Tue, 15 July 2014 16:55 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20BD11A0ADC for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tDW_f28i6Jx2 for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:55:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from darkstar.isi.edu (darkstar.isi.edu [128.9.128.127]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3EB41A0AC0 for <trill@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.160.166] (abc.isi.edu [128.9.160.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by darkstar.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s6FGtKXt018674 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:55:20 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53C55CF8.9020200@isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:55:20 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Caitlin Bestler <cait@asomi.com>, Zongning <zongning@huawei.com>, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
References: <B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC6667796616FF53@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <CAF4+nEGPMgN7t5g=2pBxdt5C3S5YAwe6uuWtSxuM0ew9NYqQ7A@mail.gmail.com> <0ycehea3rk53ox2r37s2qlhe.1405442946880@email.android.com>
In-Reply-To: <0ycehea3rk53ox2r37s2qlhe.1405442946880@email.android.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/YVbF1tSOyZvTEitFRX1G6FJqMDM
Cc: trill@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [trill] review of Trill over UDP/IP
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill/>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 16:55:55 -0000


On 7/15/2014 9:49 AM, Caitlin Bestler wrote:
>
>  >
>  > > Plus, I’d know the reason why choosing UDP? I cannot find any in
> the draft –
>  > > but I am sure there are reasons discussed in the group. :-)
>  >
>  > This was discussed at IETF 89 and the consensus there was confirmed on
>  > the mailing list. See
>  > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill/current/msg06206.html
>  > You could look at the minutes at
>  > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/89/minutes/minutes-89-trill or listen
>  > to the audio recording.
>  >
> Shouldn't that rationale be captured in the draft itself?

What rationale? I asked why we needed another "X over IP draft" during 
this email consensus check, and got dead air in response.

Also, apparently the IESG agreed to make this a WG item. I'd recommend 
asking them for their specific rationale too.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email