IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [trill] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09: (with COMMENT)

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Mon, 04 July 2016 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39FC12D53C; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 11:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LRUbS08vld98; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 11:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x231.google.com (mail-oi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4490912D54D; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 11:14:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x231.google.com with SMTP id f189so202758530oig.3; Mon, 04 Jul 2016 11:14:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1Durrag7O0d2Bhbo9/FAt28tOHji9OulTr+mTJjgmyM=; b=W5Nx7B9de19hZTXt4qJuUREJtt4+CHkDq57wk64glmAiSgkUaJBAN23vp7owBnHCpR 5R16MDqyEW2UYF1mAk6lu7FzUG4BYN9mmJpNCz50584xl0y7Q36GNey+8iCzdB1dx3zg 8xBNHoSx6Ddlm8vYBisuGtlMLYlSvsoWlhnbPUKx2R3Il4zU2pfYkujocEs8qzWzav03 Dy5MacJB3Tvb2mdtE5VBvItjYgCJitkFKA8Zl4avkFs52+A6lgq8NtcAdbpkWofVNjo1 3ejYvyf3zypkxZQrnXw5DIiLqR3TR3GnIRuAP70Idc2j9K/4OTgxCMjVrq5GhR23xA0M rk+Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1Durrag7O0d2Bhbo9/FAt28tOHji9OulTr+mTJjgmyM=; b=msO6t3gIucPhV4YQVKCUIxg7GkjG4Y2rbnr5EeFvNH7SeSSvXlZzmHtU4sGVwy8laW 4f1bhz1lq5jgLd+KfUQl7f70iHq7WGf/BvfQG/HFAQoMazP3NYLtAMjBW2mFk8d1pRzE /5ht8ifXfPe3M1irSX+hQ0ot21PJAoR362J8XcmH2mSWyKL9W79kVViZNjYkLztEyZHu /IHjq8IxgWjo9QW4zJFnQU8AneiKnZxU9udYg1f3BHDey3jJDOKugr6AWMZ9FVRPG0m7 /WW3BgGZfjE966po0Rd0WIyI7W9eaNh8VCb870kmJ70W1e8CjxY+imwno2mC5fEWPyU+ 199A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIjyt0u71yjT4NNFx/3FME1i9RHWpKQ1gO4OMFU+M3GLjz1V0I+x5C7VRqJ0xjHsdAWxMhQToYTw1M2KQ==
X-Received: by 10.157.54.203 with SMTP id s11mr7168781otd.181.1467656063625; Mon, 04 Jul 2016 11:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.52.242 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 11:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160704133205.2547.49641.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20160704133205.2547.49641.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 14:14:09 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEFOVXuiM=Dt5+HgqF6UaTSjM7KucpYnzdETnV8ft5C8zg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/ZCVs5UaEMaOe1Ms51YDNlyr1FQ8>
Cc: draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel@ietf.org, "trill-chairs@ietf.org" <trill-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "shares@ndzh.com" <shares@ndzh.com>, "trill@ietf.org" <trill@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [trill] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trill/>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 18:14:28 -0000

Hi Mirja,

Thanks for your comment. See below.

On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote:
> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09: No Objection
>
> ...
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> One question: Why are there no IANA registries for tables 3.1 and 4.1?

I believe that the first time a code point is specified, it is a
judgement call whether or not to create an IANA registry. If not, then
obviously the first subsequent document that defines additional values
needs to set up a registry. But if it doesn't appear that there are
likely to be any additional values for some time, I don't think it is
necessary to specify a registry and decide on an allocation policy
right away. By the time the first additional value needs to be
assigned the level of demand and the registration policy may be
clearer.

However, if the IESG would like, it would certainly be simple enough
to have these be IANA registries. (If that were done now I would
suggest an allocation policy of IETF Review due to the limited number
of values available.)

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email