Re: [trill] draft-ietf-trill-transport-over-MPLS - 1 week extension to WG LC (11/11/2017 to 11/25/2017) - 1/19/2018 to 1/26/2018

Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com> Mon, 29 January 2018 16:23 UTC

Return-Path: <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 054C812ECC7 for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 08:23:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.229
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.229 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 419Zvg1bteFf for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 08:23:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D1CC12EB77 for <trill@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 08:23:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 2B49AE7BE574D for <trill@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:23:32 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.38) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:23:33 +0000
Received: from SJCEML521-MBB.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.91]) by SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.179]) with mapi id 14.03.0382.000; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 08:23:27 -0800
From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
To: Mohammed Umair <mohammed.umair2@gmail.com>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
CC: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, "Jon Hudson" <jon.hudson@gmail.com>, "trill@ietf.org" <trill@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [trill] draft-ietf-trill-transport-over-MPLS - 1 week extension to WG LC (11/11/2017 to 11/25/2017) - 1/19/2018 to 1/26/2018
Thread-Index: AQHTl4UZaaeeqMtajkWQNfUMfC8lA6OLC81w
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:23:26 +0000
Message-ID: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B0026DA@SJCEML521-MBB.china.huawei.com>
References: <006901d391ad$f5e399a0$e1aacce0$@ndzh.com> <CADUKv9C7hXwUVZMvmm6=oB3oG9LF0YJYeH66CfxaGex+oPbu9A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADUKv9C7hXwUVZMvmm6=oB3oG9LF0YJYeH66CfxaGex+oPbu9A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.192.11.98]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B0026DASJCEML521MBBchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/_d81lJwGUgunXTL8Tf-Z-ZF9_Pw>
Subject: Re: [trill] draft-ietf-trill-transport-over-MPLS - 1 week extension to WG LC (11/11/2017 to 11/25/2017) - 1/19/2018 to 1/26/2018
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trill/>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:23:55 -0000

Support.

I think there is great chance of TRILL run over MPLS.

Linda dunbar

On Jan 20, 2018 10:47 AM, "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>> wrote:
This begins a 1 week extension to the WG LC for draft-ietf-trill-transport-over-MPLS that we started last November.  Due to a comment from Andy Malis:
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill/current/msg07971.html
We took a set-back and solved these problems.   Please review this draft again for the following points:

1)      Does TRILL need to run over MPLS?  Some data centers are interconnected over MPLS.  Does this capability aid in deployment of TRILL?

2)       Is this specification ready for publication?

3)      Do you know of any problems with this specification?
If I get enough comments within the 1st week, we will close this WG LC.  If not, we will length it.

Please remember we are trying to complete all WG LCs by the end of February.  Please be prompt to answer these WG LC requests so that we can include all the drafts in the WG LCs.

Cheerily, Susan Hares

_______________________________________________
trill mailing list
trill@ietf.org<mailto:trill@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill