Re: [trill] 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-trill-ribridge-multilevel-00.txt. (11/24 to 12/8/2015)

honjun.zhai <> Tue, 16 August 2016 03:15 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA55C12D5F0 for <>; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 20:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.545
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.545 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_XBL=0.375, SPF_PASS=-0.001, WEIRD_QUOTING=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4bY5JBmBozSd for <>; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 20:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with SMTP id 3120A12D08E for <>; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 20:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown []) by bjzjm-tm-app8.localdomain (SMTP) with ESMTP id DAF9D4694C1 for <>; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:15:23 +0800 (CST)
Authentication-Results: bjzjm-antispam2; auth=pass (LOGIN)
Received: from [] ([] helo=bjzjm-tm-web6) by bjzjm-antispam2 (envelope-from <>) (ecelerity r(Platform: with ESMTPA id 04/58-15140-A4582B75; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:15:22 +0800
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:15:23 +0800 (CST)
From: =?UTF-8?B?aG9uanVuLnpoYWk=?= <>
To: =?UTF-8?B?U3VzYW4gSGFyZXM=?= <>
Message-ID: <1105083587.62870.1471317323471.JavaMail.root@bjzjm-tm-web6>
In-Reply-To: <051901d126a1$1dd20bb0$59762310$>
References: <051901d126a1$1dd20bb0$59762310$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_62868_1735852098.1471317323469"
X-Mailer: TOMWEBMAIL 2.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/51.0.2704.106 Safari/537.36
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [trill] =?utf-8?q?2_week_WG_LC_on_draft-ietf-trill-ribridge-multi?= =?utf-8?q?level-00=2Etxt=2E_=2811/24_to_12/8/2015=29?=
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 03:15:27 -0000

<br /><br /><p>I think it is ready for WG LC.</p><p><br /></p><p>I am unware of additional IPRs that need to be disclosed.</p><p><br /></p><p>Sorry for my so delayed response.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Hongjun Zhai</p><p>------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p>Jiangning&nbsp;District, Nanjing City, People's Republic of China</p><p>Mobile: +086-025-5287-7345</p><p>Email: <a href=""></a></p><p>------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p><br /></p><hr /><p><br /><br />于  2015-11-24 18:15:59,Susan Hares&lt;;写道:</p><blockquote style="padding-left:1ex;margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:#ccc 1px solid"><div class="WordSection1"><p>TRILL WG: </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>This begins a 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-multilevel-00.txt.&nbsp;&nbsp; This draft is going for informational RFC to explain the two technical approaches for extending TRILL protocol to be multi-level.&nbsp; </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Please note that this draft has 2 IPR: </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href=""></a></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href=""></a></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Each author of this draft should respond on the list if they know of additional IPR.&nbsp; </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The IESG has recently asked WGs to consider the value of information documents now and in 5 years.&nbsp; Therefore, in your comments regarding WG LC, please consider: </p><p style="text-indent:-.25in;"><span>a)&lt;span style="font:7.0pt \" times="" new="" roman\""=""&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span>Is the draft technically ready for WG last call? </p><p style="text-indent:-.25in;"><span>b)&lt;span style="font:7.0pt \" times="" new="" roman\""=""&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span>Will this architectural type draft be useful to you as you explain these two options of multi-level TRILL? </p><p style="text-indent:-.25in;"><span>c)&lt;span style="font:7.0pt \" times="" new="" roman\""=""&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span>Will this architectural document be critical in 5 years for TRILL deployments? </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Thank you,</p><p>Sue Hares and Jon Hudson </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p> </p></div></blockquote>