Re: [trill] [RTG-DIR] Routing directorate QA review of draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-multilevel

[Donald Eastlake <[e-mail]>]

Hi Stig,

As below, could you look at this draft to see if your comments have been
resolved?

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   [phone] (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 [e-mail]

On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Donald Eastlake <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi Stig,
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-multilevel-03 has
> been uploaded with the comment resolutions below incorporated.
>
> Thanks,
> Donald
> ===============================
>  Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   [phone] (cell)
>  155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
>  [e-mail]
>
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:23 AM, Donald Eastlake <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
> > Hi Stig,
> >
> > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Alia Atlas <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >> Stig,
> >>
> >> Thank you very much for your review.  I'm also forwarding it to trill so
> >> that the WG can see it.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Alia
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Stig Venaas <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> Sorry for being a bit late with this review. At least the document is
> >>> well written and easy to understand. There are no significant issues.
> >>>
> >>> I am wondering about the security considerations though. Are there
> >>> really no differences between the multi-level alternatives when it
> >>> comes to security?
> >
> > Well, I guess a couple sentences could be added that the choice of
> > using aggregated nicknames, and the resulting possible duplication of
> > nicknames between areas, increases the possibility of a TRILL Data
> > packet being delivered to the wrong egress RBridge if areas are
> > suddenly merged. However, is many cases the data would be discarded at
> > that egress because it would not match a known end station data label
> > / MAC address.
> >
> >>> I have two tiny editorial comments.
> >>>
> >>> Section 1.4 typo
> >>> RBridge - Routing Bridge, an alterntive name for a TRILL switch
> >>>                                                ^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > OK,
> >
> >>> Also, several places it says "non-zero" which is correct, but there
> >>> are some instances of "nonzero".
> >
> > Apparently both of those are correct but I agree the draft should use
> > one of them consistently. I'll replace the two instances of nonzero
> > with the hyphenated form.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Donald
> > ===============================
> >  Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   [phone] (cell)
> >  155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
> >  [e-mail]
> >
> >>> Stig
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Jonathan Hardwick
> >>> <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >>> > Hi Stig
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Please would you do a routing directorate QA review of
> >>> > draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-multilevel?
> >>> >
> >>> >
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-multilevel/
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Note that this is a “QA review.” The document is still being worked
> on
> >>> > by
> >>> > the TRILL working group.  The goal of this review is to provide a
> >>> > different
> >>> > perspective on the work and to improve its quality. Hence, your
> comments
> >>> > will be provided primarily for the benefit of the TRILL chairs and
> the
> >>> > document authors.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Please could you provide your comments by May 20 and copy your
> comments
> >>> > to
> >>> > the rtg-dir list?
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > The following web page contains a briefing on the QA process, and
> >>> > guidance
> >>> > for the QA reviewer.
> >>> >
> >>> > https://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDirDocQa
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Please let me know whether you can do it, or not.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Many thanks
> >>> >
> >>> > Jon
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> trill mailing list
> >> [e-mail]
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
> >>
>